itohihiyt
Joined 2 years ago
Joined 2 years ago
The idea is to only have the keys I need for a particular journey.
To me there's no difference in this articles argument that with INI people would have to remember about the idiosyncrasies of the python implementation related to comments, and people having to know and learn the correct syntax of TOML. I'd say remembering when and where you can comment is easier too.
Either way it's personal preference. I do occasionally like to reread this though (because I'm boring): https://github.com/madmurphy/libconfini/wiki/An-INI-critique...
I don't see why I'd use this over fossil for my personal projects though.
I'm curious how Firefox comes off worse in your view, chrome seems to provide basic usage which Firefox also provides.
EDIT: just saw your other reply about it. Definitely can't agree, there's nothing fiddly with the way Firefox allows you to move, create, rename, delete, or update links and folders. Same functionality as chrome as far as I can tell.
Zim is very much based on the file system. Each note is a text file and if it has attachments or embedded images they go into a folder named after that text note.
Whilst not in markdown the markup used is easy to understand and convert. Zim itself allows you to copy a note to the clipboard in pandoc markdown and export the note to markdown and/or html (though admittedly the styling for html it atrocious).
I don't particularly like git and for personal projects use fossil instead.
Without going through the whole tutorial, and doing a lot more reading, why should I consider using this over fossil?