iskin
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
When people later explained how to keep the history of single file I tried to restored it.
Even before this Twitter thread we had talk with Colorette author and I added mention to the docs, his name to LICENSE and promised him to not replace Colorette by Nano Colors.
The Colorette mention was there 5 days ago.
Seems like people are confused by git rebase which change commit time in GitHub.
https://twitter.com/sitnikcode/status/1441827379454746637?s=...
Fork button will not work for this case.
Nano Colors mentioned Colorette in docs and Colorette author in LICENSE before Twitter thread. Colorette’s author asked m and I add the mention and agreed on the text.
> It will have a good support. My other projects from nano-series like very popular Nano ID shows a minimal number of bugs and excellent response time.
First mention (it was changed later) was added 6 days ago (threat was created 2 days ago): https://www.npmjs.com/package/nanocolors/v/0.1.2
Webpack team ask Colorette’s author to rollback API 2.x changes here (discussion was cleaned by Colorette’s author, but he said that it is how it see the best API): https://github.com/jorgebucaran/colorette/issues/70
> why not drop your fork now that colorette has changed the API back?
Author continued to act impulsively. He rolled back API in patch release instead of major made breaking changes.