ionelm
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
Can you cite some sources here? No one knows what you're talking about.
It's interesting that David Beazley did it (he is certainly more qualified) but it's doomed if it doesn't play well with other libraries ...
> distutils was a fork of setuptools
This is incorrect. Setuptools is an extension of distutils (it patches and extends distutils to have additional functionality). Distribute was a fork of Setuptools that has been merged back into Setuptools.
Also, `pth` is not a installation method - it's merely a way to customize the import system. It's a very scary feature as it allows one to execute arbitrary code (that can reside in the `.pth` file) when import paths are being set up (when the `site` module is being initialized).
Screens don't really have any black - the black you see is just a dark gray. The screens have limitations ...
Even if you'd have a very good screen, very few people go through the trouble of calibrating their monitors.
At the same time, no one can point to a scientific study of contrast choices over many types of screens and (mis)calibrations ...
PS. Screens are calibrated to ambient light - that compensates for the white being too white kind of problems.
Just a boss clearly incentivized to keep down his underlings. I think it's unreasonable to expect anything else from people with that sort of incentives.
There's also a work-in-progress cookbook with unusual stuff: https://python-hunter.readthedocs.io/en/latest/cookbook.html