impy
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
I'd like to know more about this. Do you have sources for these?
https://steinbuch.wordpress.com/2015/01/24/tesla-model-s-bat... [A blogpost about the study]
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/t024bMoRiDPIDialGnuKP... [The study/survey]
http://www.daglievemensen.nl/tesla/maxrange.htm [Interactive graph]
And as bonus a link to the Tesla Roadster battery study: http://www.groen7.nl/images/wp2013/divers/PIA-Roadster-Batte...
The UCI never made any claim that she rode it, and I don't think they will do so either. My interpretation is that they find that a moot point and simply find the uncovering of a motorized bike to be unacceptable.
"After one lap on the WC, the UCI checked the bike of Femke at the pit area with a kind of tablet. The bike was immediately sealed and taken away"
While that source doesn't specifically say who took the bike into the pit area, other sources state that it was taken into the pit area by mistake (probably her entourage) and that it wasn't the UCI who took the bike into the ICU.
http://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20160130_02100012 [dutch]
So in short, it _isn't known_ if she used the bike in the WC, but the UCI _alleges_ that she did.