iliabara

In practice, for YC or similar Bay area US startups, they are the same.

All authorized shares are issued, and then the charter is amended through board action and more shares are authorized and issued at each stage.

Ya, I'd appreciate pointers if there are errors :)

This is US centric, it's mentioned on the first page, along with the notes and links.

Reinvesting is a minority, edge case. I can't think of a single VC company in the Bay area that can have founders reinvest shares and not cause issues raising.

Ya for sure, and even paid account is very cheap, few dollars a month

Thanks! :)

Depends on the outcome.

If it's a positive outcome, then preference has no role.

This game models good outcomes, with warnings for things like down rounds

Hey thanks!

There are a ton of edge cases, but the goal was to serve as an intro, and to get a grasp of the basics.

Links in the intro to a more serious look at things.

Quick honest question: What benefit did Viam bring that isn't brought by ROS for this project?

Hey all, this is from a team member of mine at Polymath Robotics.

Ask/comment away!

Absolutely part of the plan, there will always be strange situations that the vehicle can't adapt to. So it has to stop and phone home.

Our current test vehicle uses remote operation a lot!

On a technical level, I'm not sure what sheep shearing robots in the 1980s has to do with automating vehicles... but I'd love to see a video/article if you've got one! :D

As with any large opportunity, there are multiple players in the space, both new and old. As seen with the "innovator's dilemma", I'm not sure I'd place my bets on tech straight out of the 1980/90s/2000s (sheep or no sheep ;) )