ikailan

I drank 2-3 Rockstars a day for a few months back in 2007. I knew they were probably not great for me. They made me shake. I just didn't think about it. I also couldn't stop drinking them, because I didn't get much sleep at night ... because I drank too many energy drinks.

Related: we don't often think about how much alcohol we drink or red meat we eat.

One thing that isn't mentioned is that the "friction" in selecting your friends is actually a positive. Instead of someone just shouting out to the world, my friend actually picked my name to receive some post. Not to mention: Snapchat has this built in status for how often users snap each other back. It's a built-in mechanism to get me to respond, similar to the way Facebook wanted it's "Sling" app to work, but without forcing the issue.

I used Snapchat with a very small number of good friends fairly heavily for about a month. Things we shared:

- what we ate - walking to work - on the bus/train - waiting in line - nothing at all - drawing on pictures of people - example: a friend is watching ESPN talk about the owner of the 49ers, Jed York, and drew a dunce cap on his head

I think we averaged 10 messages a day each.

Basically, for us, Snapchat was for sharing photos too stupid or personal for Facebook or Instagram.

The stickiness eventually faded. We got tired of seeing the same food, the same office, the same bus every day. Contrary to how we might represent ourselves on Facebook (SUPER AWESOME!!!!), Snapchat showed each other how utterly mundane our lives were. Of the original group of ~5 people, there's maybe one left.

We also used it a decent amount externally when we did certain kinds of live Q&A Hangouts like developer platform office hours.

I think you misread his paragraph. He was proud of the business the day in its state that day he walked into the accelerator (and presumably for some time before), not BECAUSE he walked into the accelerator.

Anecdote alert. I have a wannabe tiger mom. Unfortunately, she had to work full time+++, so full on tiger-ness could not manifest.

Just as children of many non-tiger moms DON'T learn decision making and time management skills: some do, and some do not. There are other factors at play. At a certain age, it's near impossible for a tiger mom to control 100% of someone's life.

I went to GDC in 2011. I remember that there was a country trying to talk game companies into opening a branch in their country. It was Germany, I believe. They had a beauty pageant contestant dressed in full garb at their booth. It made absolutely no sense at all.

No, not at all. Serving meals makes it much easier to convince your team to go to lunch together (though many folks will eat at their desks, PLEASE DISCOURAGE THIS). Lunching together with your team frequently is the single best benefit of a company that offers cafes for employees. It's one of the ways non-urgent but important information propagates around an organization.

Anyone that has worked in the Valley that knows ex-Yahoos have heard crazy, crazy stories of what it was like. I remember hearing a story about an employee who worked there who wanted to quit to do a startup. Her manager panicked, saying, "you can't leave. If you leave, we will lose the headcount because we won't be able to backfill it fast enough." So what happened? The manager made an off-the-books agreement with the person for her to "work from home" for a few more months while the manager scrambled to backfill, still collecting a salary, while doing absolutely nothing at all. I never followed up to see what came out of this. I probably should.

Contrary to the flame-baiting you might see, Marissa is making some progress in turning Yahoo back into a desirable place to work again. I'm hearing from good engineers I know at respectable companies that have either considered it after talking to recruiters or have actually accepted offers. I suspect there is some method to the madness around the remote working policy - we'll just have to see over the long run what shakes out of it.

Learn what you want to learn, because your tools will change. Many Ruby programmers came to Ruby because of Rails. I'm part of the camp that stuck around because of JRuby for a while, but nowadays I find that I write very little Ruby and a lot more Python.

Don't worry too much about what you hear about performance. If you are building a Twitter, then yes, it might matter what language you're learning. Ruby, Python, and PHP tend to be in the same ballpark in terms of performance, with each having their own warts.

As of late, I've been most interested in golang.org. You can learn the basics in an afternoon at tour.golang.org.

It's been a while, but there was a lot of use of Groovy on Grails a few years ago for exactly this reason. I was a strong advocate of JRuby when we did run Ruby code, but it didn't get very far.

LinkedIn isn't constrained to the JVM, as they had some apps running on CRuby 1.8 and node.js, but they do heavily favor the JVM. JVM interop DOES help with much of their existing codebase which is Java heavy.