huu

The existence of a solution to abstract equations that involve gravitons does not imply the existence of gravitons. Designing an experiment to measure and confirm the existence of the particle is a different endeavor.

I'm on a similar boat. The biggest change for me was to recognize that I'm not the one who's supposed to be doing the debugging. The more (modern) C++ I wrote, the more I found myself leveraging the compiler to find bugs for me.

SQLite is the ultimate blackbox. Reliability beyond compare

This is a valid point. I don't really have a response to it other than, I know people like the one I asked y'all to imagine, but I'm having trouble thinking of anyone I know who might fit your imaginary person's description.

You're probably right that this betrays a bias of mine. And you're also probably right that this isn't a great guiding principle for decision-making in the future.

Still, if I'm interested in increasing the total number of people contributing to open source projects, I would give an issue like the use of the word "retard" a fighter's chance.

Maybe it's not worth bending on free speech in some specific cases, but there is a point where it is worth it, ie, if there are enough people in the offended audience that the chance of losing a potential contributor is nontrivial.

Imagine you're a parent who happens upon a repo that uses the word "retard" as a replacement for "stupid person" or "idiot". You also happen to have a mentally disabled child.

Perhaps you would have contributed to that repository and now you won't. That seems materially harmful to me, to reduce the sum total of people contributing to open source.

Compare that to the potential of falling down a slippery slope to "total censorship" and I think there's a reasonable case, in a utilitarian sense, for Github's actions here.

This approach makes me happy. Interface is key.

And if she complains about being treated this way for being a woman, she wouldn't have your respect?

"The very notion of what’s appropriate for children looms over any consideration of a movie intended for children."

This is the author's justification for why he's critiquing the film. I disagree, personally, because he himself is not a child. I doubt any child would enjoy "The Tree of Life".

Excellent point, I just changed the license to MIT to be consistent with curl. Thanks for catching that.

I find it curious that pain points is given the inner quotes treatment whenever the JP Morgan CEO uses that term. It's almost like such a concept didn't exist before startups started addressing it.

I think the Tragedy of the Commons is a more apt analogy. There's a finite resource (employees) which optimally benefits each company if they were non-competitive. As soon as they start shortening the supply of that resource (in this case, making it more and more costly to obtain the resource), then it becomes a race to the bottom.

Brisket, breweries, and routers should never be mixed. The symbolism here is so disquieting.