hun-nemethpeter
Joined 12 years ago
Karma
28
Submissions
16
Member since
Mar 20
Recent submissions
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
We have an FTXUI for C++.
https://github.com/ArthurSonzogni/FTXUI
Comment · 4 years ago
Yes, the name of this attribute is rankdir.
See in the docs: https://graphviz.org/docs/attrs/rankdir/
In the sketch example:
digraph G {
rankdir="LR";
graph [fontname = "Handlee"];
...Comment · 5 years ago
Can you name or even link a few?
Comment · 5 years ago
This animation was featured at Daily Dose of Internet at 09/23 at 2:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRhnpFzIlx0&t=120s
Comment · 5 years ago
Why do you use sometimes pthread primitives from <pthread.h> instead of standard <thread>, <mutex>, ... objects?
For example src/manager/DNSCache.h use std::mutex but src/kernel/Executor.h use pthread_mutex_t?
Comment · 6 years ago
I prefer the Fastbrick Robotics ( https://www.fbr.com.au/ ) company's approach where they just creating building robots. Here is a short video on the robot in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYsWbDA0xlc
Comment · 7 years ago
There is a topic on reddit now which can shed some light on this question.
How Many Productive Hours in a Work Day? Just 2 Hours, 23 Minutes... https://www.reddit.com/r/Economics/comments/as3cyv/how_many_...
Comment · 10 years ago
According to this paper ( https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P150914/public ) they detected the signal first at Livingston, Louisiana and 6.9ms later in Hanford, Washington. The distance between them according to wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LIGO ) is 3002km (Ok, the 3002 km distance is on the Earth). If the gravity wave travel at the speed of light they should detect 10ms later (300 000/3002 sec = 1/100 sec = 10ms ). From these data the gravity travels at 434 000km/sec instead of 300 000km/sec. Almost 50% faster then light... Is there any error in my calc?
Comment · 10 years ago
I linked the official webassembly design page where the authors said compiling from JavaScript to WASM is not possible now.
"jfbastien commented on Jun 24, 2015 JS → wasm will only really make sense once wasm supports GC, and most likely JIT compilation too, which is still quite a while away. This would basically be equivalent to implementing the JS engine in wasm! I mentioned this recently and @BrendanEich accused me of having been taken over by horse_js.
To be clear, wasm's goal isn't to replace JavaScript, it's to supplement it. It's therefore not really a goal at the moment to support JS → wasm, but the features we want to implement will make it possible. I'm not sure it'll be that useful from a developer's perspective, though. You may get some size reduction, but that's about it. From a browser's perspective it may be interesting to have the JS engine implemented in wasm from a pure security perspective."
Comment · 10 years ago
Compiling from JavaScript to WebAssembly is not possible and makes no sense.
Comment · 11 years ago
Oops.. Yes, you are right.
Comment · 11 years ago
In the first example sum_f() was declared with two parameter but used with zero param.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNTMxSUsFrM The third home built using Hadrian X® robotic bricklaying technology in Wellard has reached lock-up stage and is now up for sale.
This four-bedroom, two-bathroom home was built in conjunction with Inspired Homes, a multi-award-winning turnkey home builder in Perth, and features a stylish open plan living area, modern kitchen centrepiece, comfortable home theatre, relaxing bathrooms, outdoor alfresco area and a double car garage.