hughes

Terms of use to even read the article:

> third-party partners process information about you and how you use our services, including clicks and screen recordings, using first and third-party cookies, pixels, and similar technologies

Yeah - was the brony/furry mascot original to the service or added by OP?

Who's saying they don't? One good thing doesn't negate another

There is a nuance missed in the discussion so far - Starlink is creating a new product level, differentiating service between continental and intercontinental aviation connectivity. Previously these were a single category.

If you are operating in North America for example, your service is going from $10k to $12.5k. Still a 25% increase, which is not fun, but I think a lot of the customers affected by this will fit into this category. You only need the $20k plan if your aircraft travels between their roughly-continental regions.

Nicholas Air, quoted in the article, appears to have no need for the $20k plan and should not use it.

It may be that the ideal number of ransomware operators is non-zero

What's the physical basis for this effect? Does it happen in reality or is it a style choice?

I wonder if consumer routers will end up being built in a trivially-not-a-router configuration - something akin to a pull-tab or turn of the screw that closes a circuit, transforming the device from legally something else into a router after it's purchased.

What a dumb timeline.

I would love to see this integrated into Flighty.

Why anyone would allow their TV to connect to the internet is beyond me.

Even the title "Orbital House of Cards" is unnecessarily editorializing.

I have to agree. I tried using it for a few months and it left me convinced I'll be paying for iCloud photos for the rest of my life.