Recent submissions

Comment · 12 years ago
As a user, before I click a link to a file with a .gifv extension, I know in advance that there won't be any audio. I like that.
Comment · 12 years ago
I love this. One question: how much emphasis was put on security? Can I safely let the users of my website input any string and feed it directly to the render function?
Comment · 13 years ago
These better work conditions would come at a cost. The money has to come from somewhere. You can't just complain that Amazon doesn't treat their employees well enough without explaining where you would get the money to improve their work conditions.
Comment · 13 years ago
Then I assume you mean that one party is better off and the other party is worse off (taken advantage of). Sure, that can happen. But in the case of Amazon, the workers are better off or they wouldn't work there.
Comment · 13 years ago
A contract is not a zero-sum game. The expected outcome of a contract is that both parties take advantage of each other and they both win.
Comment · 13 years ago
Better work conditions would mean higher costs to Amazon.
Comment · 13 years ago
This is funny. Voting on generated titles is a great idea. If you allowed users to post comments, just like on HN or reddit, that would enable people to play along. Also, I would get rid of classification (Entertainment, Games, Opinion, Reddit, etc.) because it doesn't add much to the website and the categories are inaccurate anyway. Just one list is fine.
Comment · 13 years ago
The chart you give for discretionary spending goes from 1992 ($803) to 2012 ($1289). It shows an overall 60% increase in discretionary spending in only the last 20 years. Not exactly a trend of decline.
Comment · 13 years ago
Let's say that Thailand has a king and that publishing a caricature of the king on the Internet is punishable by death. Meanwhile, I'm an American and I make a website in the Unites States that I call kingofthailand.com that shows nothing but caricatures of the king of Thailand. Am I getting deported?
Comment · 13 years ago
Yeah they did some things wrong apparently. I don't even know enough to pass judgment.
Comment · 13 years ago
It looks like they know what they're doing. I was especially curious about deduplication. The way they do it sounds perfectly reasonable:

> MEGA indeed uses deduplication, but it does so based on the entire file post-encryption rather than on blocks pre-encryption. If the same file is uploaded twice, encrypted with the same random 128-bit key, only one copy is stored on the server. Or, if (and this is much more likely!) a file is copied between folders or user accounts through the file manager or the API, all copies point to the same physical file.

Comment · 13 years ago
To be fair, if there's any chance that your password is the same as someone else's, then you have a terrible password.
Comment · 14 years ago
You're right. For many branded products (especially clothes and shoes), consumers would indeed prefer to buy cheaper replicas good enough to fool their social circle. If they had the freedom to do so, then yes, Nike would lose much of their incentive to invest in advertising their logo. And yes, that would probably be a good thing for parents. And the only advertisements remaining would advertise quality instead of exclusivity. Or maybe Nike would come up with a way for someone to authenticate someone else's shoes. I don't see how they could do that though.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton