houzi
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
Also, TUI's have their place. I haven't looked much at GUI alternatives, but k9s is really great.
Would also assume that interactive apps are simpler to implement if it's a TUI.
We ended up using the REST API for automated provision management and there are certainly warts. It's a far cry from being a turn-key solution, which I'd argue is preferred by a large enterprise.
It's great for click-ops if that's your use case, but that also wouldn't qualify as an enterprise use case.
It's fine, I guess. But it did take a while to learn the new ways.
I think this is the main complaint from users with decades of experience. Their scripts and old knowledge stops working.
I did have a look at numpy and on my machine the tests did not bloat it as much as you made me believe. The `core/tests/` modules are 3MB and the `__pycache__` doubled it to 6MB. What do you refer to as "test case artifacts"? The modules, pycache, or both?
Also, wrt you statement on pandas; is it the debug symbols that account for the bloat, or the libs themselves?
> By default, `args` is a set of derivation names denoting derivations in the active Nix expression. These are realised, and the resulting output paths are installed.
?? - I think the author really hits the nail on the head with this point.
> I think for the ease of installation alone rasterio is a blessing.
How does rasterio simplify installation, when you still have to deal with gdal's C extension dependencies?