holub008

Nested Knowledge is building the future of Systematic Literature Review (SLR) by consolidating every step of the review process (search, screening, extraction, synthesis) in an updatable, collaborative environment. NK primarily solves biomedical SLR, and our users come from a variety of backgrounds, including academia, insurers, med device / pharma, and regulatory. To date, 2 million studies have been reviewed in our software.

We want you to build models taking our Robot Screener and Smart Tagging products to the next level and design automations in new areas, like critical appraisal. Our team is small, and you would be our first AI specialist, setting standards and frameworks in place. We value independence, creativity, and a focus on end-user value and experience over technology.

https://wellfound.com/jobs/2866132-machine-learning-engineer

Comment · 2 years ago

From a different direction, it was taught in one section of my university's data structures course. We were guinea pigs (https://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]), but I recall the experience being fun and students largely enjoying D. Transitioning to C++/Java in later coursework and professionally was a breeze.

Comment · 3 years ago

Good point, but headshots are essentially required in arenas other than job hunting. For a startup, it would be unprofessional to pitch investors without headshots of the founding team in the deck. Even in hiring, I'm willing to bet most hiring managers look candidates up on LinkedIn where they will see a headshot.

Comment · 3 years ago

Does this dilute the headshot currency in the professional marketplace? If anyone can generate a flawless, idealized photo of themself, surely it reduces the signal headshots once provided: that you have the means to pay a photographer & are willing to invest the time / give a damn about appearing professional.

It might also damage the sense of identity they provide, if the generated images wander too far from reality of the source images.

Comment · 4 years ago

Right, MEDLINE's "tagging" system is MeSH, which is a large controlled vocabulary. MEDLINE does contain bibliographic data + journal keywords, but its real value add is MeSH, which is used for search, related publication identification, etc. in PubMed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_Subject_Headings

Comment · 4 years ago

Content tagging in online systems has existed since at least the 1970s, with the earliest example I can think of being MEDLINE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MEDLINE

Comment · 4 years ago

Interestingly, the original piece is a later Beethoven Sonata, Op. 31 No. 3. The model has its styles down! https://youtu.be/P-Q5aBAw-T4?t=78

Comment · 4 years ago

> How else would you like them to state that without being overly verbose?

"Our results suggest that some sexually transmitted parasites, such as T. gondii, may be correlated with appearance and behavior of the human host."

I appreciate your viewpoint. I would counter it by saying that there are two sources of uncertainty here: choice of model & sampling variance. It's my opinion that in scientific writing, one should be precise with which source of uncertainty they are guarding. If I'm allowed to group these together, why can't I make a similar statement of causation of any old spurious correlation - when obviously my model is bad?

Considering this example again - isn't it arbitrary that the authors get to choose which hypothesis (among many, like attractive people being predisposed to own cats) they get to claim "may" be demonstrated?

Comment · 4 years ago

I was directly quoting the article and am not a domain expert. It is interesting to see some commenters here state that it isn't an STD. It appears this is an open question.

https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/190/3/386/5905708 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24986706/