heyyyouu
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
In theory, they could probably use DCMA to go after anyone using the terms (right or wrong). In practicality, they used it as a tool to go after this particular one because they didn't like what they were doing.
You also, by the services terms of use, have to source when something is partially or fully written by ChatGPT.
Companies can use Azure OpenAI Services to get around this -- there's data privacy, encryption, SLAs even. The problem is it's very hard to get access to (right now).
It's a well done video explaining the problem and really the frustration of creators who are fighting these bots and haven't given up.
I am a tech executive in my company and my direct e-mail address is at the bottom of every Web site. Yes, this means I deal with routing all sorts of problems BUT I know instantly when there is a problem. Any problem. And I can actually help. But really it helps me with my job. It's win/win/win.
Plus, poor customer services is simply inexcusable -- you have to treat people the way you want to be treated. You're letting yourself and everyone else down otherwise. There is ethics and morals in business and they are important.
It doesn't have to be my way but there are definitely ways to do it, do it well and not break the bank.
If it had been a normal medicine, the protocal is to stop taking it; and you're fine in a few days. I had the bad side effects for a month, and there was nothing anyone could do.
Just something to think about; things can go wrong, and dosing strategies like this don't always take that into consideration.