Recent submissions

Comment · 2 months ago
I would be curious as what you would consider an example of good design, then I can see how far an agent gets with that. In any case, contrary to what you might believe, this landing page does convert pretty well.
Comment · 2 months ago
So I had this problem while I was designing the landing page for month17.com (disclaimer: that's my domain). What worked to not let it look like complete AI slop was using other landing pages that look good as "inspiration" for the model, through providing screenshots which yields sufficient results, in my opinion.
Comment · 2 years ago
Shoot me a message, I am VP of Engineering at large European software logistics company, where I had exactly the same challenge (outsource vs insource). Email is in my profile.
Comment · 5 years ago
https://handoff.design - Import from Figma, author and export to Vue/HTML + CSS
Comment · 5 years ago
If that’s true why would be this obstructionism be there? It does not make any rational sense if we can use nuclear to win us time until we have working fusion and/or wind/sun/etc energy implemented.
Comment · 5 years ago
Curious, I am pro nuclear as well, looking at the technological benefits, but how are we practically going to handle nuclear waste that will be there for thousands of future generations to handle?
Comment · 9 years ago
Not tested them both: I work with annual billing for my SaaS. The pricing page shows monthly prices, which works well for me. Customers buy a contract for a year which they can cancel at any moment. Obviously the remaining months within that contract year will not be refunded. Note that the SaaS is only 300 euros a year so your mileage may vary. (B2B market)
Comment · 9 years ago
This landing page might just be a way to discover if there is any traction on the market without needing to build the actual product.
Comment · 9 years ago
What's wrong with conventions? It seems to me that code conventions would make code more maintainable.
Comment · 9 years ago
In my experience being productive is more a matter of setting a clear scope of goals on which I'm going to focus on the next X months. Other than the strict necessary tasks that might interrupt activities related to these goals, no extra goals may be added until one is finished. After that, at the beginning of each day I decided what micro-tasks I want to do (write paragraph X of paper, fix bug Y in project Z) and I don't go home until I am done. Everyday it seems like I am only doing small tasks but after time these tasks add up and I finish big projects. Big projects/goals are not finished over night, you need time. It's easy to get demotivated when there are big tasks ahead. The key is to chop them into do-able, reachable tasks and you hold yourself accountable to fix these tasks no matter what.
Comment · 9 years ago
Strong story
Comment · 9 years ago
Strong story.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton