harshithmul

Also thinking deeper, I think your question also is very broad on aspects to answer. Technically in times where there is a gathering of ai and people I think a single chat surface is not the right experience but yeah having a UI saying agents as tabs felt tooo boring and actually fed up.

Just wanted to keep it fun but at the same time can we elevate the experience when there is a common surface where a bunch of ai-npcs and people can meet.

I hope it answers, happy to dig more in a different direction if you felt I understood it wrong

yeah a question with which I started :)

I definitely love the format, but the real reason is each town comes with it's own creative story, theme and interaction rhythm. I first thought about making one town that held them all which I wanted to have for myself or say my own town. But then later thought different people want to have their own representation of it, since it's english, different themes and all about creativity it has no bounds.

In the hindsight I also wanted to figure out which experiences it improves vs which it decorates. Curious what you felt when you experienced it.

hey thanks for the feedback, agreed there are a lot to get right

1. If you have self hosted it yes then we need OpenAI api key, we are also working to get things working with llama so should be available soon (but if from cloud you shouldn't have got this error)

2. We also have moved away from openAI embedding (BGE-M3) to our own hosted in the cloud.

In self host we already have claude code support happy to help there

We are working on it, LLaMA models are not working good when it comes to finding facts from the message. We should have this out in the next couple of days

Could you help with how the workflow looked like? How does it ensure that the code is tested?

Ahh, yeah paper trail makes sense. But the ownership aspect of where it went wrong can we understand without the workflow restrictions also right?