haraball

A couple of rules I have that have worked for me so far is:

Colleagues, tasks, compensation - if at least two of the three are good, it's fine to stay. If not it's time to look for something new.

The first year is a learning year, the second is a productive year, and the third is a "what else can I get out of this place" year. If nothing changes in the third year, then there's not much more to learn from the company and it's maybe time to move on.

Norwegian has the phrases "fra og med" and "til og med", where the "og med" means "including". So "from and including Monday" removes the ambiguity.

They recently discovered the gene for shyness. It was hiding behind two other genes.

  Location: Frankfurt, Germany
  Remote: Yes, or onsite/hybrid if local 
  Willing to relocate: No
  Technologies: Python, Javascript, Docker, Django, React, GCP, Ansible, Github Actions/CircleCI, Linux, OpenCV, NLP, MLOps, ++
  Résumé/CV: Happy to share, just give me a ping
  Email: username @ gmail

12+ years experience as a software engineer in small but growing companies, working on medical research, web applications, and data analysis. The last years I've been building pipelines for data scientists and bioinformaticians, with a focus on automation, data quality and reproducability. I'm interested in continuing down this path of working with (data) scientists, but open for suggestions. Send me an email, and let's chat!

Yes, I'm happy with the flow. In Firefox I have a button that adds the article with one click, and in Safari on iOS it's two clicks; share -> instapaper.