hambes

Tailored suits fit better than off-the-rack street clothes? That is not an argument for suits, it's an argument for tailoring.

or just tax wealth and profit instead of income and tools. these are neither new ideas nor are they specific to the proposed llm-based worker replacement

does anyone have resources on how to build surface-to-satellite missiles at home? seems we'll need those at some point

I am not scientist enough to judge this, so please someone enlighten me: most categories i've read through that find a shift do so with an increase of about 0.1-0.2 standard deviations. that does not sound significant to me. is that enough to make the claims this study makes?

the article mentions three types of stakeholders: contributors, debuggers and incident responders. it entirely fails to mentions consumers, who mostly care about backwards compatibility of changes, and thus about the type of a change. once the type is established, e.g. a change is breakimg, the consumer next cares about the scope to make downstream adjustments.

the part about broken promises regarding breaking changes is _kind of_ fair, but only assuming tooling isn't able to track reverts. accidental breakages occure with every approach and better to have an approximation than no information at all.

I've always wanted to do this, but can't get over the linux tty only supporting 256 colors. If I could get that higher and maybe add unicode support, I'd love to go tty only.

then the military would also act life-saving, since they are defending the attacked country

because approval processes take time which i can use to keep working

I agree that a `gh stack` command is not needed, but this feels to me like just a better UI feature for a good git workflow. It literally is about making multiple smaller PRs that build on top of each other.

yes, i do realize that. thank you for expanding on my point.