hahaxdxd123
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
> You don’t even need a visa to leave
Either unable to critically read or extraordinarily pedantic. Classic HN.
There is simply no visa that allows skilled labor to come to the US, work a temporary job for a multinational that's paying them in their home country, and leave.
The closest thing apparently is the "B-1 in lieu of H-1B"[1] and guess what? Another commenter posted this FT article that accuses them of abusing this B-1 visa [2].
Traveling for work is a huge pain in the ass, doubly so for this sort of temporary work assignment, and triply so if it's to the USA.
I've always been told to use a tourist or family reunification visa. For example, if China cracked down on this, they could easily put 10,000+ Americans in jail for a similar "visa abuse". They obviously would not bite the hand of foreign direct investment like this though.
I think it's informative to interpret the law - especially in the age of Congressional gridlock - as 300 years of terrible legacy code papered over the Herculean efforts of ops teams (the government bureaucracy). When that ops team starts arbitrarily treating the oceans of gray zones to their whims, to reward friends and punish enemies, you start the long trek to serfdom...
[1] https://www.wsmimmigration.com/us-immigration/temporary-work...
[2] https://www.ft.com/content/c677b9aa-2e89-4feb-a56f-f3c8452b3...
Because he's Saquon Barkley. Other than your lead + maybe 1 or 2 others, everyone else is pretty interchangable. At least Saquon is interesting.
> the core insight: predict in representation space, not pixels
We've been doing this since 2014? Not only that, others have been doing it at a similar scale. e.g. Nvidia's world foundation models (although those are generative).
> zero-shot generalization (aka the money shot)
This is easily beaten by flow-matching imitation learning models like what Pi has.
> accidentally solved robotics
They're doing 65% success on very simple tasks.
The research is good. This article however misses a lot of other work in the literature. I would recommend you don't read it as an authoritative source.
Hmm
The prevailing wisdom is that American dominates tech simply because American companies are better. While that's true, I argue that a huge portion of this comes instead from the monopolistic winner-take-all dynamics of tech not found in other industries. Despite the American car manufacturers being significantly worse, they still exist. The European tech industry is significantly worse, and they're almost nowhere to be found in tech. The Chinese tech industry is worse in many ways as well, yet shielded by the Great Firewall, they've found themselves with cloud hyperscalers, frontier AI models, global consumer businesses, etc.
Once upon a time, this mattered less, but as American values diverge from the rest of the liberal democracies, the the effect American tech has on our political discourse and economies are becoming a matter of national security.
This is from the perspective of someone who works in the American tech industry but is not American, and has spent a fair amount of time in China.
As an opinion piece, I'm not sure my arguments are entirely correct, but I think they're worth thinking about.
Just that it would happen.
Every time something like this comes out, his supporters mass flag the article no matter how relevant it is to tech. Browsing /active is the only way to see some of these.
In their defense, if every atrocity and grift this administration committed were allowed free and fair voting on HN, it would completely clog the front page.
That's OK.
They have no idea my sub-region of California produces the entire GDP of their country.