Recent submissions

Comment · 4 months ago
fable 5?
Comment · 5 months ago
We are already distributing the skills without Git. We package everything (skills, assets, CLI, wizard) into a single file and distribute it.

The problem is collaboration without Git.

For example: I am a business person, someone sends me the skills/plugins, and I install them effortlessly. I use Claude Cowork to generate some financial information related to my area, and I need to share this information with the development team.

Right now, since I am not familiar with Git, I would probably upload it to Google Drive. The developers would then download it and push it to the repository in order to use it for coding.

Comment · 5 months ago
engineering, product managers, business people.

the problem we have right now is the repository (where to store the documents).

lets say i'm a business expert and want to use a skill to create a md file with all the info about some area. It is ok to learn claude/cursor, but to upload this generated material to git is another level of problem...

Comment · 5 months ago
we are shipping as plugins.

we have a internal cli that creates the plugin on the fly after you select the domains you want to work with. This cli is a standalone cli + wizard that does it all. Generally speaking, we have skills that are code related and mostly independent (ex: a skill to teach python how to log in our tech stack). Another type are skills related to our workflow (a skill to plan that outputs a file that is used in the next step "implement", together with a dev agent and so on)

Comment · 5 months ago
not sure if this premise is valid. In most cases, skills (and other assets) are not independent of each other. Take gstack por example; it would be weird to install skill A without installing skill B. They work together.

So, it is true that some skills are independent, but not all. IN my company, we ship assets by domain and workflows (development, discovery, data science, etc)

Comment · 10 months ago
i would love to see this on cursor as well
Comment · 1 year ago
also, voice matching is veryyy important
Comment · 1 year ago
Just need to polish the solution... I experienced some crashes with zoom.

I am the IDEAL user, willing to pay a lot if this works. Count on me feedbacks.

So far:

good: - initial config as good, easy and very simple to feel secure

bad: - high cpu usage - zoom asked me to restart mic - could not make sure if the software works... Google meet has not voice testing loop... Zoom has it, but it did not work for me.

Comment · 2 years ago
Edit: Not now, but maybe in the future
Comment · 2 years ago
Can I use it for other platforms,. Like lg tv os webos? Samsung tv?
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
cool. Looking forward for this.

Also S3 (+ azure and GCP) would be a good 'edge' k/v store.

Someone could start with Github in a simple project, migrate to S3 to handle more requests and then migrate later to a full server solution... All of this keeping the same client codebase

Comment · 2 years ago
I am a user. What i would like is something very "simple", no server

Use the same SDK and ping github rest api to get the values of the the flag.

I know, this is very weird... But i cant deny it would be helpful for very small projects

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton