gtech1

If you run openssh open to the public...

Funnily enough, Asimov tackles this in his short stories. The power goes to...the robots ( AI basically )

Do you genuinely use em-dashes in your regular writing ? I'm just curious because whenever I type I simply press -

Because I don't trust someone else to not train or steal our source code, or, even legally, introduce some silly cause after we are invested/locked into their infra, that allows them to do whatever with our property.

And on equal footing, I trust our security more than theirs. Case in point.

Ah, you assumed I meant SaaS GitLab. I meant the self-hosted version. I would never host our source code on a remote service.

GitLab ?

ok...there's no 'general' IQ afaik

We don't even know what human consciousness is. We can't even answer if we have free will or not. And you are proposing that AGI..is what exactly ?

Weird, I feel I'm talking to an LLM with a limited context window.

>>Centos didn’t go away. It changed. Rocky (et. al.) took the old centos role, and >>I see this as a win/win for everybody. >>Ubuntu is the disaster Linux distro, I won’t touch Ubuntu if I have any other >>option.

>> All I said was I hated ubuntu

(???)

take care now

You actually said Rocky was a successor to CentOS as well, which is what I responded to. As someone that tried to upgrade CentOS to Rocky, I can tell you that it may succeed it in name only, if that's what you meant. Physically you have to start over. If you re-read my first reply, I said as much originally.

So what's your point then ? That these are toy/homelab distros ? If so, then we are in agreement

And knowing all this you still can't see what the use case might be for BSD ?

So then what's the point of mentioning Rocky as CentOS's successor ? In what way is it 'succeeding' ? That you can do a fresh install of Rocky ? And those stuck on CentOS can't upgrade ? Really useful those decades of support if your distro goes belly up