grodriguez100

Joined 5 years ago

Karma
372
Submissions
176
Member since
Nov 13
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 2 days ago
I don’t think they need to “allow” this specifically. Every new pane opens in a shell prompt. You must start the agent from there, so you can start each agent with different keys/accounts already.
Comment · 3 days ago
We don’t know, but that’s itself a good thing, isn’t it? if it is not “obvious AI slop” and looks human-written, then even if it was AI generated, that would be fine...
Comment · 7 days ago
Not implying I agree with the decision, but I don’t think VPNs make this less effective. VPNs may be used by what, 0.1% of all users?
Comment · 18 days ago
Let me guess your native language. English, perhaps?
Comment · 1 month ago
“The good old people from Sun working at Oracle” is now Oracle as well.
Comment · 3 months ago
> why can't you then write the solution and PR yourself?

You can. The policy explicitly allows you to use AI for understanding the codebase, debugging, etc. It just says “no AI generated content”. So if you use Claude to increase your understanding but then write your own code, that’s fine.

Comment · 3 months ago
Comment · 3 months ago
Comment · 4 months ago
Comment · 5 months ago
Not Malaga according to the article — destination was Palma de Mallorca.
Comment · 5 months ago
> Saying “with this transformative new technology, we’re able to deliver 10x the value with half the engineers” is a much stronger message, even though it doesn’t make much sense (if this is true, why not keep your engineers and deliver 20x the value?)

I guess not every service or product needs 20x the value. That depends on the market segment, market maturity, and actual demand.

Comment · 5 months ago
Same here, been using 50% English and 50% Spanish for months, no particular reason, just whatever feels easier at the moment. Sometimes I even switch languages in the middle of a session. I have not noticed a difference in the quality of the output.
Comment · 6 months ago
Yes, this is correct.

I meant that the ruling awarded interest from the date of judgement to the date of payment but does not account for Inflation between the date of purchase and the date of judgement.

I didn’t mean to imply that interest and inflation are unrelated, I was referring to the two different time periods. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton