greattsclerouse

Joined 7 years ago

Karma
8
Submissions
17
Member since
Jul 6
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/greatscleroose; my proof: https://keybase.io/greatscleroose/sigs/YiaZhVJSVi8iS4zIsKK0NxDzi_7TyCZ_DVLL8pC4izo ]
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 5 years ago
thanks. I've read different stuff pretty much every where I go so thought it might be worthwhile to ask this community about their thoughts. appreciate your input.
Comment · 5 years ago
In defining and discussing important notions of social networks and platforms, I will borrow some ideas from the infamous Steve Yegge , and the one and only Martin Kleppmann for ideas related to “local first” data, as well as, to help the user to better understand some of the technical notions of a truly distrubuted data platform (Martin literally wrote the book on this!).
Comment · 5 years ago
The discussion from here is going to get somewhat technical but I will do my best to cut through the nerk talk and get to the point. Based on our discussion in Part I, we know that there have been a long history of failed social platforms — many of which have tried to solve certain aspects of this problem. Core components that need to be understood well are notions of Identity Management, Anonymity, Security & some good old CAP theory!
Comment · 5 years ago
Data nerds say things like, “In God We Trust, All Others Must Bring Data”. This is something I think most reasonable minded folks can get behind — especially when it comes to establishing a common truth! But, how would anyone know if I decided I was going to make everything up?
Comment · 5 years ago
Use Matrix or KeyBase and self host. Im shocked how much people still trust these shady companies.
Comment · 5 years ago
I think it pays a lot of dividends to understand some of the history of the past so that we can learn from them as we look to build something better for the future, so I’ve decided to publish some of my thoughts on this topic and also share some of my findings with the community so that nobody has to go down this massive rabbit hole again in the near term.
Comment · 5 years ago
In 1000 years we will have ascended :) but if not, I hope to be chilling on Risa somewhere!

In all seriousness, in the future I suspect we will use a combination of these types of capabilities but they will all be linked together in a way that prevents totalitarian control of speach.

I think some of the best technologies today are keybase.io matrix.org briarproject.org and community.mattermost.com

My view is that the next emerging social network will be based on a secure and self hostable compute fabric that leverages zero trust compute and secure compute, data sharing, etc. I think Urbit had the right direction but went crazy and lost the plot.

I'm working on this problem personally and I hope to be in alpha / beta testing for certain aspects of the platform by end of year :) Feel free to reach out if you want some additional details.

I think it pays a lot of dividends to understand some of the history of the past so that we can learn from them as we look to build something better for the future, so I’ve decided to publish some of my thoughts on this topic and also share some of my findings with the community so that nobody has to go down this massive rabbit hole again in the near term.

History of Social Networking: https://october.substack.com/p/part-i-the-next-great-online-... https://october.substack.com/p/part-ii-usenet-a-genuinely-pu... https://october.substack.com/p/part-iii-slashdot-and-advogat... https://october.substack.com/p/yik-yak-secret-and-the-minima... https://october.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-demise-of-branch

One of the best readings on this topic is here: almost a library about the history of the net and Netizens http://www.columbia.edu/~rh120/

This is a pretty good overview of current state of alternatives: https://medium.com/hackernoon/so-you-want-to-leave-facebook-...

good write-up on layering complex systems and why this is a hard thing to solve for: https://jods.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/issue3-brand/release/2

MIT/Zitrain: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4455262/Zittrain...

Activity-Pub/SOLID/SSB/Matrix/others: In my view, the links below offer us a real foundation for the future of the internet that can be used together to build a better social fabric

https://solidproject.org/about https://activitypub.rocks https://matrix.org https://briarproject.org https://scuttlebot.io https://joinmastodon.org https://keybase.io/blog/keybase-proofs-for-mastodon-and-ever... https://keybase.io

But even as we find our way with the technology, we are repeating the mistakes that we should have learned from in the past: https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2018/07/cage-the-mastodon/ https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2019/07/statement-on-gabs-fork... https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/12/20691957/mastodon-decentr...

"At the core of the open source ethos is the idea of liberty. Open source is about inverting power structures and creating access and opportunities for everyone." — GitHub employees' letter to GitHub

And Now, it’s about time to discuss the net bill of rights that our future social network should adhere to: http://www.columbia.edu/~hauben/Book_Anniversary/Appendix.pd...

Here’s the thing, once you read all of this stuff you begin to get the idea that this problem is actually bigger than just a social networking platform—there are lots of these and yet as every Netizen can see, the problems still exist. The fabric of our problems isn’t so much that we don’t have the technology to solve the problems of our times—the issue is that it almost requires that we burn down the existing system in order to make the world a better place! BUT WAIT!!!

Before we think about burning it all down, I think there are a few things that we should consider first and, of course, there will be lots more links and examples along the way! One thing that I want to emphasize as we go on this journey, is that form must fit function—up until now, I think social networking and it’s controlled/heavy-handed evolutionary path has left a rather sour taste in the mouths of many. But, this conclusion is both a result of the evolution of social networking, but also the result of a change in the way that we use technology and our relationship to our devices/machines.

I'll be publishing a series of blog posts on this very soon. Hope this helps!

Comment · 6 years ago
I'd recommend starting here: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/audio-video-courses/#physics

In my experience these are some of the best online courses you can watch to learn physics. Personally, I would look into the trying to watch the lectures from Walter Lewin--Walter is a fantastic orator and has a really great mad-scientist persona that is really captivating. Some additional archived lectures can be found here: http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/34001 and here: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/archived-physics-courses...

I got my minor in physics from NYU many many moons ago (yes I'm getting old), but I found that the MIT lectures and OCW materials went way beyond the NYU coursework in both breadth and depth. I watched these lectures and worked through the lecture notes & assignments for Physics I, II, III, Quantum I, II, and several others in addition to digging into the Mathematics lectures / content. I found this material to be the most helpful out there. I'll also point out that I emailed the professors (Lewin, and others) and was pleased to receive a warm and helpful response on several occasions. I hope these are as helpful for your learning as they were for mine.

Once, you are able to complete the video lectures here, OCW has a massive amount of content for some of the more advanced courses that aren't in video format. In my experience, going through these video lectures and some of the mathematics lectures should set you up well to be able to comprehend even the most advanced content across field theory and string theory.

Cheers!

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton