gkfasdfasdf

I love it. Reverse minesweeper describes it perfectly.

The latest version of Claude Code is the compiled with the Rust version of Bun, I've been using it and haven't noticed any regressions.

In addition to an assert, a 'nonnull' attribute on compilers that support it seems like a good idea.

The lib is a joke I know, but these will absolutely get your prototype greenlit.

Having used both Anthropic and OpenAI models at $work via copilot extensively, I have to say GPT 5.5 currently is best at getting work done with minimal mistakes. However, Claude Code is way ahead of OpenAI Codex in terms of harness features and tooling. MCPs, skills, sub agents, these all were pioneered in Claude Code first. Perhaps that contributed to Anthropic's success.

Odd they used GPT-5.2 and not GPT-5.2-codex. i.e. the one optimized for coding agent tasks.

Someone should fork yt-dlp and rewrite it in Rust...and have it use bun exclusively

Yes, it’s actually similar to discriminating based on race or religion, in the sense that it’s an arbitrary, meaningless criterion to discriminate on. If the Rust Bun port is better in every measurable way — passes all tests, has the same performance or better, and fixes existing bugs — then who cares what language it’s written in or how it was implemented? The point is that it’s higher quality. If you don’t trust the Bun team when they release a Rust version and give it their stamp of approval, why did you trust them when they released the Zig version two weeks ago? It makes no logical sense, and it makes the yt-dlp devs look foolish.

Idiotic. Why do they care what language it's written in? If it works it works.

Putting the markdown in the URL, that is very clever!