gautambay
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
Have both your companies explicitly stated that the freeze on entry-level hiring is because of copilot?
Do you have a perspective on whether this will exacerbate the shortage of senior engineers in a few years, if way fewer new people enter the profession in that time period? Or will it be okay since the need for humans will reduce commensurately?
"A decade in academia taught me a bunch of sophisticated algorithms; a decade in industry taught me when not to use them."
Source: https://twitter.com/mrogati/status/726115691703619584I've been on multiple H1B visas, at both large companies and startups. I've also sponsored H1B visas as an employer. I would support this bill.
The headline is a classic example of sensational journalism by the Times of India.
The $130k salary requirement applies only to "dependent employers", defined as employers with over 15% of their workforce on H1Bs. This is clearly aimed at reducing H1B misuse by TCS, Infosys, and their ilk.
The vast majority of companies who employ people on H1Bs aren't "dependent" employers by this definition, and hence will be unaffected by the salary increase rule. If anything, they'll benefit from more visas being available to non-dependent employers.
Also, startups will likely benefit from the 20% requirement.
As the internet increases parity in education globally, immigration reform will become even more important for the US to retain its edge, as people born outside the US will comprise a larger percentage of the world's best entrepreneurs.
As an immigrant trying to fix education, #1 (fix education) and #3 (education reform) ring especially true for me, but it's also fascinating to think how closely-tied the two are.