gassi

> with no bots

but plenty of LLM agents!

> I was only ever interested in engineering challenges.

When you pigeonhole yourself into only finding challenge in one field, you're bound to be disappointed eventually. While I do miss some of the challenge, these tools have given me more freedom to tackle difficult problems outside of software, both personally and professionally.

Ran out of VC money now that only AI companies get funding.

You wouldn't hold that opinion it you did maintain a popular open-source repo or interact with AI "PR review" tools at a serious level. Even the most SOTA models are willing to accept/merge absolutely trash PRs so long at the summitter can convince it that is addressed it's review comments.

I've taken the position that anything the ultra-wealthy say is likely wrong, and every decision they take will negatively affect society, unless and until its corroborated by an unbiased source with expertise in the subject matter.

Fred Rogers, Terry Crews, Lin Manuel Miranda, Henry Cavill, John Cena, Steve Irwin and Dave Grohl to name a few.

And contribute your changes back upstream, right?

The prompt itself is copyrightable but not the art/code generated from it.

Wherever you want to be.

  Tailwind works for your team? Go for it.
  Inline CSS for your solo project? By all means.
  Still stuck on SASS? It'll keep working just fine.
  All in on modern CSS? More power to ya!

> In a world where we can type anything into a text box and get the information back instantly we are circumventing the need to visit websites altogether.

This is purely anecdotal, but the only people in my extended circle making this transition (to any extent) are the technically savvy; everyone else is slowly realizing how awful AI tools and "AI-first experiences" can be and are actively trying to avoid them.