gagagaga7
Joined 2 years ago
Joined 2 years ago
If you havent tried udio yet, get on it. Mindblowing.
Additionally, while almost every culture/society had slavery, it was UK/christians who basically ended slavery globally.
Much of this could be replaced by audio/video input.
Secondly, if the LLM can identify at risk patients or drug checks, you don’t need a nurse or 2 nurses to dispense medications or identify at risk patients. Multimodal input LLM plus a caring low skilled person can do the necessary things far more often.
These 2 factors alone can reduce nursing workload by half.
As for family doctors, I would personally be very happy to transfer my basic general care to a good LLM right now. Everything I need is straightforward, protocolised and the hassle of making appointments, delays, waiting rooms, form filling etc is more of a barrier to my healthcare than current LLM deficiencies.
An LLM that takes multimodal input (audio, video, images, observations etc etc) and outputs whatever is required (a podcast summary of clinic patients, a checklist relevant to a patient’s condition in preop) is the future.
Forcing doctors, nurses and allied health to manually document everything they do in annoying web forms is stupid and soul destroying.
Multimodal LLMs will also replace much of medicine and nursing which is good.
The value of all the AI companies is predicated on high chance of AGI, and gpt5 failing to be revolutionary may pop the whole bubble (+10 trillion of market cap)
An interesting european study where patients with heart failure were randomized to ecmo or not ecmo, with no significant difference
Studies like this are not often run in the us because there isnt a national health service which can facilitate this sort of trial, and no industry corporation has an incentive to run this either
So when dealing with very expensive complex treatments which sometimes seem to “work” impressively, remember that it may be completely useless