frnz

thanks for pointing this out!

Multi-billion-dollar copy-machines are the same as a person just dropping by and having a look? If you can't tell the difference, what are you? Be you human or robot?

that's the joke. They are making fun of their own text-based interface to sell the visual side.

This is so true, it really struck me, thanks. For me, this is the most important post of the week. By far.

I imagine, that unsolved foot sliding is considered as a genuine part of the genre, but personally I really enjoy fixed feet in gameplay very much.

"The physical modeling is promising but extremely compute intensive. " This is not true, at least for the makers of pianoteq. Their simulation runs fine on a raspberry 5 with 1 gb.

btw. thanks for your perspective.

of course not directly, especially with names like gpt123. But broad consumer perception is a totally different kind of thing and there I see a lot of artificial-mind pre-god perceptions. At least the term intelligence, historically human- or creature-bound, will not come off into self-abstraction as mere product too easily.

of course, sry, I didn't read the descriptions. Thanks for clarification!

so an empty train does not show up?

you or the dog? In both cases: respect!

Audio normalizing seems to be quite hard for this kind of use. I tried this 20 yrs ago with parts of a (mouse-)pointer device, a rigid nylon strap around the chest and 8 cm of flexible length in between. Mouse pointer wheel (one dimension only) was driven by change of length. For some hours of fiddling it was quite reliable.

60.000.000 kg ÷ 1.000.000.000 user

is about 60 gramms of co2 per user?