fredamaral

amazing analysis. for me, either canvas- or carousel-based editor solves the mental issue of having to also load a significant amount of cognitive data all time you deal with very large codebases. (it also automatically require you to have a wide screen sufficient to make use of the tool properly).

only point here is to get used to deal with files on the horizontal, not vertically way of thinking, which is kind of rooted in the way we program first hello world.

it brings me a thought: is it just me who kind of hate the "super-modular-files-with-10-lines" way of doing things today? would love to get back to the way of doing things in the past, like super well-commented files, with hooks here and there to help you navigate, single file for single contexts...

definitely. not talking about the vc specifically, but the investment chain. a typical free rider, directly or indirectly.

case closed. you are right... could of course make the things a bit more difficult for someone not backed by a state sponsor. but if that's the case, you are right.

agreed. but it does not mean i couldn't be. as per the terms, the content of a CLA could be anything. and that's my point

dont you think that something as simple as a CLA (contributor legal agreement) would prevent this type of thing? of course creates noise in the open source contribution funnel, but let's be honest: if you are dedicating yourself to something like contributing to oss, signing a CLA should not be something unrealistic.

awkward, but heard very recently that open source is not "vc backable, go away". maybe it will change now, after the infrastructure pillars of the modern world ruins in front of those many saas/ai/web3/cloud/whatever investors

there is someone sanitizing its kyc. simple as that, hehehe