flexorium

Joined 9 years ago

Karma
2
Submissions
13
Member since
Sep 1
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/flexorium; my proof: https://keybase.io/flexorium/sigs/nPUOrpsaReGBeVuz9LuQvs8aOjAqdVMFrAIsRTbFTJQ ]
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 6 months ago
We appreciate this information you share in the open
Comment · 6 months ago
Nice! very useful
Comment · 6 months ago
That’s definitely part of the solution to limit the risk, but it does not eliminate it. That’s exactly something the tool demonstrates very well. If you can exploit , you can gently ask OIDC to mint you access on the fly. That’s what I call “dwell mode” where you hang for say 1 minute and you perform arbitrary thing with the OIDC access. So yes with short lived creds there’s no “offline access” and if leaves more traces but still.
Comment · 6 months ago
Thanks! I got tired of talking about it to defenders. I wanted to talk to Red Teamers too and SOC / detection engineering people. I wanted to build a tool that someone can just have the CISO try it directly.
Comment · 6 months ago
Absolutely not. The same TTPs apply almost 1-to-1 for Insider Threat scenarios. We've built the Deciduous Attack Trees (shout out to Kelly) for insider threats last year. It overlaps. So either you start with Initial Access that's purely public and pivot deeper or you already have a modest foothold (like intern with read only access) and off to the races.
Comment · 6 months ago
Comment · 1 year ago
We're pretty excited to finally talk about this new TTP.
Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 2 years ago
In the audit log of the organization you can see an event, but by that time you have lost visibility into what the attacker really executed.

So a malicious tag payload (stage 1) will still remain in events, but Stage 2 will be lost completely (only the fact that log was deleted) and that would not leak any what really was executed with like `curl | bash` could be silent

Most likely the end goal is to backdoor the final artifacts, so one could diff, I guess.

Comment · 2 years ago
When people think about Supply Chain security, they generally think of SBOM and vulnerabilities in your direct and transitive dependencies.

But most people are completely blind of vulnerabilities in the Build Pipeline of those same dependencies. The SLSA framework considers those https://slsa.dev/spec/v0.1/threats#build-integrity-threats to some extent. And OpenSSF aficionados know, but it's still niche.

I like to think of those as a parallel universe! An orthogonal plane of vulnerabilities that are beneath the surface and completely independent of vulnerabilities into the source code of the project itself. Basically never tracked as CVEs... Those can be nested deep, deep, in a transitive build dependency 5 levels down.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton