fkdk

Time will tell whether Codeberg's approach of Valetudo-like community-building will work out.

Thats the question, right? And thats exactly the point.

It is about weighing the real cost of trillions of replicated license sections against some theoretical/imaginary risk of someone being successful in court with this.

that make sense to me, but has this ever happened? has anyone ever downloaded some (in some way broken) software by an unpaid open source developer and then tried to sue that person?

it sounds mind-boggling to me that this would actually be possible, so I wonder if this was ever tried.

“To arrive at a just estimate of a renowned man’s character one must judge it by the standards of his time, not ours.”

Some of my early research (elementary school) suggested that certain glues can form a peelable, skin-like layer. Maybe that could be a promising way forward?

Could be, i understood it differently

Do you? Even if its a technical blog post and you learn incorrect things from it?

Next up: Lawmakers put Indiana pi bill back on the table.

Dawkins takes a functionalist position, which is the dominant perspective in biological research.

The author makes it easy for himself by degrading the philosophical/scientific discussion into a political rant.

You can't unsubscribe from this because it is not a normal service, but a racket. By definition: a service that creates its own demand.

I advise having a read through Sapolskys book "Determined" to get another perspective

What would "abuse" of an LLM look like? Saying something mean to it? Shutting it off?