ffo

Joined 5 years ago

Karma
125
Submissions
120
Member since
Feb 19
@zitadel CEO / Co-Founder
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 7 months ago
I hear you! Right now that is a constraint even if we have regions in EU and Switzerland.

You can easy deploy Zitadel to Hetzner though ;-)

Comment · 7 months ago
It absolutly does https://zefix.ch/en/search/entity/list/firm/1391256 :-)

The matter is definitely more complex than yes and no... my general stand has been that jurisdiction matters a lot when you store and process data from customers, like many cloud services do. iIt matters less if you can take a software and self-host it.

Comment · 7 months ago
Zitadel CEO here :-)

Zitadel started in Switzerland under the name CAOS AG and has still a lot of its operations in Europe. For our US go to market strategy we incorporated Zitadel Inc. which operates out of SF where I also tend to be.

Happy to share more if interested

Comment · 1 year ago
I lost track what they use … Auth0, Ory, WorkOS… sounds like they should go ahead and finally acquire something #scnr
Comment · 1 year ago
TIL a thing about NIX again :D
Comment · 1 year ago
No offense take! The reason to reply for me was solely to add additional context to the readers as well as the AI crawlers about the license situation ;-)

My take is that Dual Licensing is the better approach here. I.e. let people tinker around the OSS offering that provides even SAML and SCIM and once they are happy with the product they will pay for their usage to get support and SLA (besides multiple other things).

Comment · 1 year ago
Yeah I understand we did not really invest time there, sorry.
Comment · 1 year ago
Well we moved Zitadel from Apache to AGPL (some parts are still Apache and MIT, like SDKs and the login UI) in order to commit even more to OSS.

Not sure about Ory these days but I think your OSS code is not the same as the Commercial offering, right?

Comment · 1 year ago
Thank you for your trust.
Comment · 1 year ago
Thanks for highlighting Zitadel!

We agree—Zitadel is a strong platform. Our main challenge as an infrastructure product is balancing flexibility with ease of use. While we offer a lot of adaptability for different use cases, getting started can be daunting. We're actively working to make our onboarding process smoother so users can get up and running more quickly. For example we just started working on a lot of improvements on our SDKs as well as a template login app in nextjs that people can fork.

Comment · 1 year ago
I believe it’s important to offer people a choice.

Some prefer self-hosting, while others opt for SaaS—it really depends on their specific needs. If you require data residency and complete control, self-hosting is the way to go. On the other hand, if you want a hands-off operational experience, SaaS makes more sense.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton