ffo
Joined 5 years ago
Joined 5 years ago
You can easy deploy Zitadel to Hetzner though ;-)
The matter is definitely more complex than yes and no... my general stand has been that jurisdiction matters a lot when you store and process data from customers, like many cloud services do. iIt matters less if you can take a software and self-host it.
Zitadel started in Switzerland under the name CAOS AG and has still a lot of its operations in Europe. For our US go to market strategy we incorporated Zitadel Inc. which operates out of SF where I also tend to be.
Happy to share more if interested
My take is that Dual Licensing is the better approach here. I.e. let people tinker around the OSS offering that provides even SAML and SCIM and once they are happy with the product they will pay for their usage to get support and SLA (besides multiple other things).
Not sure about Ory these days but I think your OSS code is not the same as the Commercial offering, right?
We agree—Zitadel is a strong platform. Our main challenge as an infrastructure product is balancing flexibility with ease of use. While we offer a lot of adaptability for different use cases, getting started can be daunting. We're actively working to make our onboarding process smoother so users can get up and running more quickly. For example we just started working on a lot of improvements on our SDKs as well as a template login app in nextjs that people can fork.
Some prefer self-hosting, while others opt for SaaS—it really depends on their specific needs. If you require data residency and complete control, self-hosting is the way to go. On the other hand, if you want a hands-off operational experience, SaaS makes more sense.