feelandcoffee
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
This is the type of behavior antitrust authorities should enter to break the company in different entities.
Let's say you've been working in place A, you show your code to an LLM service (like the dozen or so Copilot-like services) and tell them to refactor. And for the sake of argument, let's say the LLM uses your code and questions for its next training dataset.
A few years pass, then you go to work at Place B, and ask a question that happens to be related to the problem that Place A's code solved, and they give you Place A's code as is.
For some context in pricing, a battery for a framework laptop cost $59 US (now in discount for 50).
How is this even legal? The youtuber got the packs from the company through a logistical error, didn't sign an NDA or embargo agreement, and gets armed mercenaries at his door for 'leaking' when the company did.
This it's some criminal level of intimidation, something you expect from a gangster or a cyberpunk dystopia where companies bypass the state establishing arbitrary punishment for internal rules you didn't sing on.
I hope this guy lawyer up, and get as much as possible from them.
Why a company with the minimum brand awareness thought this was a good idea, it's still beyond me.
I'll even say that the high bandwidth push in the public was highly related to that. Even HTML5 video players, adult websites were faster to implement it than big streaming websites that still used flash or similar tech.