fafhrd91

i am original author of pyo3. Yuri Selivanov (author of uvloop and edgedb) suggested pyo3 name.

name was chosen after `uranium trioxide`, pythonium trioxied - pyo3

You still need to initialize inner structures and buffers. Cache allows to avoid that.

This is 1.0 bench

We use actix at azure iot

one thread in best case. But process may die. Depends on panic

Actix provides actor abstraction over synchronous code and allows to communicate with it in async manner. TechEmpower benchmarks uses sync actors for db operations and http part is async. I am not sure how this help though, tokio-minihttp also uses threadpool for db operations, results are not that good

i think from ergonomics standpoint, actix is very close to rocket. of course rocket has some advantage, but actix compiles on stable and has zero codegen code. as soon as proc macro stabilizes both will be on par.

from performance perspective, actix is faster than rocket on any type of load.

first, you need to define what is crash in rust means. panic or error. in general case you can not recover from panic. in case of error, type system prevents unhanded errors in actors. you can restart actor, but that is controlled by developer action.

we use actix. but that is all i can share :)