f2n

Well yes but if you use their trash mobile site then the lack of NSFW content is the least of your concerns.

What's wrong with marking content NSFW? Its not censoring it, simply providing a warning to those who may be in a place where their screen is visible and that might not be appropriate.

>I'm not familiar with monero, but aren't all transactions in cryptocurrency public and permanent?

Not with monero (and possibly other cryptocurrencies)

I had the Tor Project's repos added, but I guess no auto updates.

Thanks for posting, turns out one of these was mine. I forgot that it existed. 1213 days of uptime, still running Debian Wheezy (don't worry, i'm bringing it up to date now)

No, it would get customers used to ignoring the LEDs on it.

> It wont let you vefiry by entering a code

That's odd because I've absolutely verified numerous Signal clients by entering a code, without granting access to my SMS (I use Google Voice so my SMS database is basically empty except for random spam from my shitty carrier)

Do you have a source for that? I assumed the lessons learned from SPDY and QUIC eventually went into HTTP 2

I don't understand how any of those are remotely related to whois being removed. It's not like it represented anyone that could feasibly be sued before, just a whoisguard service, usually

Also using Firefox 60, demo is a blank page.

You've linked that thread a couple of times here, never really elaborating on the nature of your concerns, nor do you elaborate on the specific nature of your concerns in the ticket. Have you considered elaborating on the nature of your concerns? Is there a specific vulnerability in chromium you feel could be exploited here?