Recent submissions

Comment · 5 years ago
I tried it. Already benefitted. Thanks for putting this together. Let us know how we can contribute, if any, to the features/code.

Thanks again.

Comment · 6 years ago
and for audit. Audit/Compliance is one of the worst yet valid reasons to introduce complexity, redundancy and all sorts of costs into projects. It's also why some people earn a living out of it purely.
Comment · 6 years ago
There is nothing here imho. It's just mastery of crafts, how often/much you practice (not just rote learning) and I guess to a smaller extent, natural proclivity/talent.
Comment · 6 years ago
Just wondering, was it any good? Would you say it played a big part in passing whiteboard coding and landed your current job? Asking because I'm thinking of doing it myself..
Comment · 6 years ago
And yet, when you're "right" you can be very wrong. E.g. during a heated discussion, you really feel truly charitable, selfless and sacrificial and want to help the other party out of their self-destruction/unveil the self-deceit. You're truly rooted in absolute truth and righteousness. You're doing an excellent job inside until.. you screw up royally on the execution or picked a wrong choice of medium/channel e.g. WhatsApp to express your intentions or to render assistance. It can even be your choice of words or things beyond your control. And then it's all downhill from there. No amount of right intentions saves anyone except when it's coupled with near perfect execution.

How then do we execute our intentions (truly charitable) ones to bring about the maximum efficacy? Experience.

Sometimes, you need to take a step back to take 4 steps forward. Sometimes you need to be wrong to be right. It's like fishing/kite-flying, sometimes you need to lax sometimes you need to roll it in.

It's an art. Some can never truly master it.

Comment · 6 years ago
Thanks for confirming! Have always been doubtful.
Comment · 6 years ago
Yeah, everyone's thinking they are the next FAANG and they need to copycat their interview style. Coupled with the fact it's so easy to outsource technical interviews to leetcode/hackerrank, they'd be thinking why not?

Well, you might really have to play that game if you do come across THAT company which you are really interested in and they unfortunately, practice leetcode style interviews. Then you'd be glad you are already prepared for it than not.

Comment · 6 years ago
The last time I had a chat with someone from a FANNG like company, the consensus was that it would not be unreasonable to be grinding algo/leetcode for 6 months to ace that FAANG interview.

However, my personal experience with a tech interviewer at FAANG is that the technical interview holds the same weight as other non-technical rounds (not sure if he's BSing me) and for good reasons. He is aware how broken coding interviews are but to be fair to FAANGs, they don't have a shortage of good applicants. The only way they can sieve/filter fast enough is as such. He is also acutely aware there are good engineers that they may lose simply because they can't perform during live coding but it's a trade-off atm. There just isn't a perfect solution. And he also reminded me that there are many applicants who didn't make it at first try only to succeed on Nth attempt. They don't discriminate applicants who retry and generally see it as a positive trait (grit and interest in company).

On this note, you'll have to ask yourself if investing 6 months to a year is worth the effort of acing only 1 part of the interview? Also, why FANNG? Introspect. Is it just for the brand on your resume? You ready to be a cog in a giant machine? Or it's genuine interest in their work or you need that paycheck? If so, go for it.

How about startups around your area?

Comment · 6 years ago
You mean unpopular?
Comment · 6 years ago
Hey c'mon, back in elementary school, every cohort has at least written about their favorite past-time during writing classes. Just because the subject/title is the same, it doesn't mean the writing is the same. Every writer ends up with a style of their own and as a teacher, it was mostly a joy to read. ;) The only reason why there isn't a 1000th tutorial on Favorite Past-time is because there wasn't high speed, unlimited internet back then and students weren't allowed to use the computers back then. ;)
Comment · 6 years ago
Haha, no. You can still copy-pasta and also blog about it as real content. C'mon, how else can I feel good about my shitty self?
Comment · 6 years ago
Because they have no young kids
Comment · 6 years ago
Livelihood aside, how the heck do you go from being a dev to becoming proficient in reverse engineering? Are these stuff all self-taught through years of tinkering/interest before it becomes a profession?

I can already imagine the amount of technical barrier and knowledge gap one needs to fill even before getting started..

Holy shiet. It's impressive.

Comment · 6 years ago
How about pinned sites that have not been accessed for > 7 days? I neither use the app nor visited the site for e.g. 2 weeks.. what will happen to e data for e pinned site? Apple is being vague here.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton