ezekg

I had a feeling this wasn't a vulnerability in GitLab as much as it was for Ruby!

Why? Is/was Ruby vulnerable?

Is this a bug in GitLab or in Ruby? It's hard to tell from the report and the patch...

Liability. Compliance. Chain-of-responsibility. Risk. This has always been the case in business, and it will continue to be the case (at least until artificial intelligence actually replaces that need).

> I guess Turso hosting was not making enough revenue?

I would guess it's more that the founders want to exit before AI replaces them. (Based on the doom-and-gloom narrative in tech right now...)

Studying and writing about my conclusions, or just writing in general, is one way that I am still able to enter flow state outside of programming.

The context is i.r.t. the monthly cost and the cost of one's time, which has a monetary value, as well as the cost of tokens. So I think it's rightful to assume the topic is of a monetary pay off.

I promise you something like this will never monetarily "pay off."

This is the clearest explanation of why I never really liked Stephenson.

Haskell always hurts my brain, but in a good way. I want to understand it, but haven't been bothered thus far.

> or look at your phone or whatever

> have a means to get it ... in tv broadcasting etc

I think you're missing the point of wearing an analog watch, which is fine, but still missing the point nonetheless. :)

As an avid watch wearer, all analog, I built the game so I could improve my skills, because under pressure when somebody asks "what time is it?", I want to be able to tell them exactly, because I should be able to read it! I think it's good to want to improve your skills, whatever that may be. You shouldn't bar people from that because you disagree.