Recent submissions

Comment · 15 years ago
To quickly run through these in order: 1) The program was extended. And regardless, the original company investment was made during the holiday, so as long as I roll over within 60 days, I'm OK. 2) I did hire a tax lawyer, which is why I understand the circumstances pretty thoroughly. What they weren't able to do was recommend a specific course of action based upon firsthand experience, which is why I'm asking here - either for someone who has that experience, or a pointer to a lawyer who's specifically experienced with this particular cranny of law - It's not feasible to delay without wrecking the deal - A stock transaction is not an option for the acquirer - We're a C corp - I asked a CPA as well since what I'm looking for is experiences and strategies. I concur with the gist of this advice and will have a tax attorney look over it if I come up with anything.

Thanks for taking the time to weight in.

Comment · 15 years ago
If you have specific names of advisors who have dealt with this particular problem, please share them!

The usual suspects (highly regarded startup attorneys, startup CPAs) have been helpful in analyzing the situation but I haven't found any who has experience with the problem at hand, and I'd rather not be a pioneer here.

Yes, we've signed an LOI; the transaction is imminent.

Comment · 15 years ago
Good suggestion. I've had two well-regarded startup attorneys look at the situation, and the acquirer has had their counsel look at this as well (we're not their only acquisition in this set of circumstances). There's no solution that does not trigger other issues.

Besides, my goal isn't to avoid the taxes, period; it's to put the money in to something that the government and I both agree is a worthwhile alternative: creating economic value through continued investment. I'm just looking for a way to do so with modest risk and return, instead of the very high risk and return of a typical startup investment.

Comment · 15 years ago
I think I explained the answer to your question in the original post. The government has decided that in this case the money would be better spent creating jobs than going in to general funds. I agree. I'm looking for a mechanism for doing that which accomplishes the stated goal with less risk than a traditional startup. Win (for me), win (for the government), win (for society).
Comment · 15 years ago
:) Yeah. I don't want to move the proceeds to an offshore tax haven or something. If I can follow the letter and spirit of the law to create jobs instead of paying taxes, I think everyone wins. And the more HN readers who know about this and can do the same, the better!
Comment · 15 years ago
As I mentioned, I've asked two attorneys (one tax lawyer, one general counsel), a couple of CPAs, and a financial advisor or two for good measure. They all could explain the mechanics but none of them had much to suggest beyond traditional startup angel investments (which I'm going to do with some of the proceeds - but I need something lower risk for the rest).

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton