Recent submissions

Comment · 27 days ago
I'm working on Aficionado (https://aficiona.do) - a scrapbook/tracker for media aficionados to remember, share and discover films, games, music, books and tv shows they enjoy(ed).

It's been a lot of fun working on it and using it myself, hopefully other might find it useful.

Comment · 2 months ago
My guy, I am bummed that such a powerful and readable language isn't more popular. I don't need to grow past anything. Being bummed about stuff is part of life.

The reasons it isn't more well adopted are many. The conclusion that therefor it's "not beautiful or enjoyable to most developers" is flawed and baseless. It assumes perfect meritocracy where the most beautiful and enjoyable languages for developers are the most popular ones.

Comment · 2 months ago
Would evaluating the reason(s) (a futile endeavor, if you ask me) replace my sadness? Hardly.

It's a beautiful language I enjoy working with, and I'm saddened it isn't used and adopted by more people.

Comment · 2 months ago
Reading the utopian sentiment she exudes describing this vision (which, to me, seems very dystopian), it makes me wonder if the discrepancy can be explained simply by an age gap.

I'm trying to remember if I was as much a tech-optimist as she is, at her age. I remember fondly imagining a futuristic smart PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) that's everywhere with me and I can use it like in Sci-Fi movies and games.

I'm assuming this is roughly the same vision, for the next generation that already has smartphones?

Yet something about this new "modality" of listening in on your thoughts, hearing your brain, is just so icky and dystopian to me. Guess I'm old?

Comment · 2 months ago
This is way too funny. Thank you.
Comment · 3 months ago
Very cool, I love Scala and am quite sad that it isn't getting the interest and popularity it should.
Comment · 3 months ago
Comment · 8 months ago
Comment · 1 year ago
"hypeless growth"
Comment · 1 year ago
Yes. He mentions that in passing that saying people will accuse him of hating on it because he didn't profit from it. I think his point of view is that his company's attempt was smaller scale and not part of the $10B+ waste?

In any case I don't fully understand what he's trying to say other than negating the hype (which i generally agree with), but not offering any alternative thoughts of his own other than- we have bad tools and programming language. (why? how are they bad? what needs to change for them to be good?)

Comment · 1 year ago
Working on a side project that I hope to launch in the near future, I can relate. At first I tried sharing with friends/family but noticed how disinterested anybody who isn't working on it themselves are.

I personally thrive on conversation and a back-and-forth to hone my ideas and thoughts so it's definitely been hard.

I ended up settling on creating system prompts for both OpenAI and Anthropic for co-founders with the explicit prompt that they critique and challenge my thoughts.

In ChatGPT web interface you can create a folder for that context and then all my conversations in that folder relate to my project.

It isn't perfect but it does help and it's a soundboard that's available 24/7, and lets me develop my thoughts, do my research, etc.

There's a risk of it being an giant echo chamber. But then again, most startups are until they hit the market and start validating against reality.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton