everythingabili
Joined 5 years ago
Joined 5 years ago
They're both also stuck in the "golden" 1970s, and is without the subsequent stages that contain bureaucrats, politicians, mafioso, tech oligarcs and demagogues, which pretty much reduces the prior stages to proles, subscribers or fodder.
As Adobe continue to enshittify their products, to public disgust, they're more profitable than ever, I'm not sure if these cutesy "Townspeople" metaphors mean anything at all.
It's really good (no affiliation).
/* Uses: https://github.com/FCPS-TSSC/GQuery */
function exampleQuery1() { const gq = new GQuery(); const result = gq .from("Tags") .select(["ID","Name"]) .where((row) => row.ID == 12) // you can use > or < etc .get(); JSON.stringify(result, null, 2) }
The HyperCOD(e) version is limited, but you can go next card, and run on idle commands. And it does colour!
Don't expect too much, but making this was fun and I'm now going to make a few stacks with it.
* Hypercard/Director/Photoshop based Multimedia
* AppleScript/Filemaker
* Web Development Prograph CPX / SQL Web Development
* Python/Zope/SQL/PHP Web Development
* Processing(Java)/P5js/GDevelop Edu/Games Development
* Python/AppleScript/Sheets/AI/Python
At the end of the hour, people demoed their creations. "This one is clunky and works like this...", "This one uses text to" etc.
The last person got up and showed some doodles and notes on sheets of paper. He said "Mine is the only one that actually works and is well designed, I just need to code it now".
I don't know if there's a lesson in there, but to me it was cool as.
* BespokeSynth - make music with flow diagrams * Orca - make music with shimmering conway worlds * Sonic Pi - make music with code
All free, all mind-blowing, all a possibility for composing and creating in a different metaphor to the left-to-right DAW like Garageband.
I recently helped a tutor using BespokeSynth to create audio explainers, wiring together frequencies and interactive oscillators and waveform viewers to explain resonant frequencies (or something, I didn't completely get it)
https://static.everythingability.opalstacked.com/bespoke_syn...
Norman is ace. Although his books turned me into a usability weirdo unable to switch off my usability sensors... be careful! :-)
As is Raskin - whose interface "notation" (click-drag-click etc) I think isn't talked about enough.
Can I also throw in these...
Don't Make Me Think: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Dont-Make-Me-Think-Usability/dp/032... - I found this a REALLY useful book, and great to share with people too.
A Pattern Language https://www.amazon.co.uk/Pattern-Language-Buildings-Construc... - OK, this is a bit esoteric, but it's so valuable and lots of geeks/UX-ers kind of aim to create their own pattern language as opposed to a UX-dogma.
Information Architecture https://www.amazon.co.uk/Information-Architecture-Beyond-Lou...
Visual Language https://www.amazon.co.uk/Visual-Language-Global-Communicatio... - a kind of fundamental - hard to find.
--
There are dozens of methodologies to learn, and put into practice. I would put it that you don't really learn UX, you do it, and revise - in order to solve problems and make things better. Once you've digested some of the ideas you need to start trying the methodologies out. This is harder than it sounds. Even companies that claim to support UX, sort of bugger things up.... in that UX can't "fix" crap... it needs to be in at the beginning.
My favourite activities / methodologies, that produced REAL results were
* Ethnography - kinda just hanging out and observing what actually goes on. One client used to print off every page to proof read their changes cos the font sizes were designed by 21 year olds and they were 60+. The applause I got for raising the font size would never have been found any other way than sitting in the corner. * Card sorting - often collaboratively with armfuls of post its to decide on categories/navigation * Wireframing - I had less success with paper prototyping, but still ... * Personas + Use Cases
...and Eye Tracking - which tbh was SO VALUABLE, not because of the insights it provided, but for the EVIDENCE (video and heatmaps) that you could use to persuade the big wigs.
So find a way to start getting yourself into trying out various methodologies, to fix problems. Doing UX when things are "kind of OK" can be quite hard imo, especially at the beginning.
Your background will be so useful, again imo and experience, you will be able to use UX to provide guidance and ideas and then MAKE THE BLOODY THING which lots of UX-ers can't do. I liked the cross-over - I code a bit and sometimes found it easier to make what I wanted, rather than specifying it or creating "designs".
Good luck!
Tom
What makes you think LLMs will get better? The more we've seen AI develop the more fine tuned everyone's senses have got hyper-sensitised to what's AI and it just reeks of the uncanny, rendering it ultimately useless.
Doesn't work.