esubaalew

appctl can work in simple steps. appctl setup; and then appctl chat; to chat in termianl or appctl serve to chat on the web

Cool point it is not about comparing run-kit with ipython and they are different things. Ipython is about python and mine is about different languages. And btw I am adding variables between different languages

TBH, my plan was not to replace any of the previous ones, and the name polygot is from my idea of many languages in with a single command, and as simple as run 'code' or run lang code

TBH my plan was not to replace any of the previous ones and the name polygot is from my idea of many languages in with a single command and simple as run 'code' or run lang code

I am not good at English. but I am sure my claim is correct and it my idea not LLM's

added note on the readme

You're right—Kotlin can be used as Kotlin/JS for web development, and as a compiled language when we're talking about Android development. Context matters

You're right—and the same applies to Kotlin. Swift is more like Rust, C, and C++ in that it compiles directly to machine code. So yes, Swift is currently listed under the wrong category.

As for Kotlin, it could reasonably be placed under either "Web & scripting" or "Compiled," depending on how it's used. Since Kotlin can also compile to JavaScript, its classification depends on the context. If we're talking about Android development, then Kotlin is clearly a compiled systems language.

To clarify: Swift is a compiled, statically typed systems language, much like Rust, C++, or Go. Its core toolchain (swiftc) compiles code into native binaries.

It's simple. It was made by someone who's just starting out with Rust.

Yes, that's exactly the point. What I'm trying to do is: 1. Use Rust because it's fast. 2. Make REPLs universal, so we don't need separate REPLs for different languages. 3. And third—though not a new idea—is to create better abstractions, like allowing print statements without requiring a main function, and accessing variables without explicitly printing them.

The idea is similar to IPython, which provides an interactive interface for programming languages. The motivation isn't about building a massive CLI tool—it's about questioning why we need a separate REPL for each language when we could use a single command-line interface that lets us switch between languages on the fly.