estefan
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
This is exactly the opposite of what he claims in his essays. One quote:
> The other way we differ from some arbitrage operations is that we participate only in transactions that have been publicly announced. We do not trade on rumors or try to guess takeover candidates. We just read the newspapers, think about a few of the big propositions, and go by our own sense of probabilities.
There are several others in "The Essays of Warren Buffett" where he also describes how he just uses public information.
Read "Nail It Then Scale It" and "The E-Myth Revisited". You'll save time and money. You might also study business strategy (free courses on Coursera) so you can evaluate your idea from business fundamentals first. The more you can invalidate it (no market, massive incumbents, no demand, too costly, etc.), the less time and money you'll waste building something nobody wants, and the better placed you'll be to spot a truly great opportunity.
As a developer it's natural to focus on your strengths. You need to validate ideas before doing that.
Yes it is, but you only see it's a naked self if you look into the method. From the outside there's nothing in the name to indicate that it doesn't take a reference. So potentially it means that for every method call you need to check that it takes a reference to `self` instead of ownership. This would be especially annoying with third-party libraries.
As it stands, Rust code can break the principle of least surprise, since what happens in a method can affect the associated instance variable (in this case `open_socket`). A user could easily write several lines of code and only discover that `open_socket` has been moved into a method at compile-time.
I found myself having very small coding-compile iterations when writing in Rust to catch issues like this (but that was also undoubtedly due to the fact I was learning).
Is there a pro tip to avoid this issue?
I'm all for disclosure, but seriously - if RH want Ansible to be used in enterprise they can't expect patches at this rate. The researchers releasing the exact exploits so quickly is just irresponsible IMO.
"Man's Search for Meaning" by Frankl graphically illustrates the importance of having a sense of purpose, which I think a lot of people lack when they retire to live the dream of doing nothing.
I think the key is to be able to choose not to have to work for some asshole boss, or do work you don't generally enjoy.
I've become very disillusioned by the dream of insane wealth and the ability to retire early. Instead, I want to work on something I feel will make a difference and that interests me for the foreseeable future.
Or pollution. The city is a cesspit. I can't wait to get out.