ericfrenkiel

Joined 16 years ago

Karma
1,089
Submissions
210
Member since
Oct 19
Founder and CEO at Pomelo, a consumer fintech startup; previously, founder and CEO at Singlestore (W11), a DBMS startup now valued at $1b+.
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
You’re old fashioned.
Comment · 2 years ago
The difference between equality under the law or equity under the law.

Equity is by definition relative. Equality is at least absolutely reasoned without the interference of relativity or subjectivity.

By what measure can a system of government be most fair and immune to corruption? The one where everyone has equal rights or the one one where some are “more equal” or “less equal” than others?

Comment · 2 years ago
So when are we banning TikTok?
Comment · 2 years ago
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords.

Progress in robotics is beginning to look non-linear and it will have only positive impact on the world.

Skynet won’t be humanoid terminators. Or even drones. The real threat of AI is if/when it will be applied to the field of virology.

Comment · 2 years ago
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords.

Progress in robotics is beginning to look non-linear and it will have only positive impact on the world.

Skynet won’t be humanoid terminators. Or even drones. The real threat of AI is if/when it will be applied to the field of virology.

Comment · 3 years ago
The label you are looking for is “duly convicted party,” per the 13th Amendment:

“Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”

Comment · 3 years ago
Categorically, definitionally, and historically wrong.

What you are you are referring to is the following: “ Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States…”

First, “welfare” here means “the state of well being.”

Second, it is tied to the “United States” as a whole - not any given individual, especially because the Supreme Court has ruled the government has no duty to protect its citizens from harm (Deshaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 1989; and The Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 2005).

Thus, if the Supreme Court has established that the government has no obligation to protect citizens from harm, it has no obligations to economically provide for citizens either. That’s called “charity” and it’s what churches have typically done by collecting revenue (tithing) from its congregants.

20th century governmental usurpation of charity by rebranding it as “welfare” is a distinctly modern concept, that also happens to be constitutional, insofar that the government collecting taxes to distribute benefits on a needs basis does not violate the Constitution, which is entirely different than being enumerated in the document itself, which you erroneously conflated.

Comment · 3 years ago
In some ways it's even more expensive to remain "credit invisible" because of the security deposits now needed when you set up utilities, getting a mobile number, applying for an apartment rental, etc.

Building up a strong FICO score is the easiest thing with the exact mindset of OP with effectively the same amount of friction thanks to the "miracle" of autopay.

Comment · 6 years ago
Seriously?

You don’t find the million people (the Uighurs) in concentration camps “outlandish”?

How about the thousands of students rolled into smithereens by tanks in Tianamen Square? Too “cartoonish” for you?

smh

Comment · 6 years ago
I would say it’s your own bias which is informing your opinion. California has only gotten more “progressive” with each election.

If that makes you happy, I hope you understand that it’s “progressive” policy which has caused crime to explode, housing prices to rise, and people to leave the state.

Comment · 6 years ago
Yeah, no. Reality doesn’t bear out with your theory.
Comment · 6 years ago
Epstein didn't kill himself.

Video footage "accidentally" deleted and the backup footage also lost due to "technical errors."

His death and a cleanup so slovenly and brazenly done in front of the public eye is a mockery of America as a nation of "liberty and justice for all."

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton