emilfihlman
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it is on purpose, and not a good purpose. The trust model of the web is fundamentally broken.
Has anyone else ran into this?
Is there some state/federal law that delegates power over some things to the municipalities/cities/counties etc that allow them passing ordnance like this?
It feels weird to me that this would not be a state / federal level decision, but maybe that's just my Finnish ass.
Like for example if you think there's a possible problem, say that if there's a problem and suggest a workaround, the agent will change direction and implementation to that, even though there never was a problem.
Ie, actually, yes, shouting at the AI can (and does, there are papers on this), work.
Holy shit this was the most infuriating thing I've experienced in a while lmao, I felt so relieved when the button was turned to blue, but then so visceral "no no no no no" panic when it turned to the gradient.
Amazing
E: this is a horror simulator, my breathing is becoming shallow and fast, I love it.
Do it after you have actually made the rust version work the same as the C version.
Insane to be adding complexity, breaking compatibility and introducing new bugs to software that needs to function correctly.
Chatgpt can absolutely do the things here: it can give you files, it can integrate and show web pages that you develop, etc.
There is no need for an "agent", the chat version works just fine and is actually easier for novices.
This is simply not true. Guardrails are enforced by the compiler, and both gcc and clang have a myriad of flags to make C safe, not to mention Fil-C.
This is also not a memory issue but an actual logic issue, so Rust doesn't help there.