ellimilial

If it fits on a single machine - jq, flat files, JSON lines / avro if relatively flat. Change to a tabular format if when nesting not required.

Postgres JSONB works, but it requires maintaining a heavy server process. So does Lucene/elasticsearch.

I have been yearning for embeddable store (in line with SQLite the support that both works and also keeps the data compressed like JSONB). I know there were some attempts, tried some of it those, mostly monstrosities).

Try a nociception, drug design or pharmacy group at your local university. Chances are they’ve been doing this for years.

Great content, but incredibly difficult to trawl through.

It's always great fun compounding new, manual 'indexes' when you discover you need another query.

With a lot of fuzziness, some state and temporal stuff.

Yes please, it took me over 5 secs to figure out what to click, felt like ages.

Diffusione Urino

Sure it's delish, very appealing.

Isn’t this counting the lines with any G/C in them vs the total number of G/C literals?

A context might be useful.

From what I gather, the author is a researcher in bioinformatics related field. This may indicate that they tend to work either alone or in a relatively small group. The domain is small scope data processing/manipulation, research/exploratory code, ,likely short-lived or even one-off.

The progress in this context will possibly be governed by sheer processing speed (e.g. it’s unlikely anyone will delve deep into the code, a lot of iterations to ‘just get it done’ instead of testing etc.).

If this is more or less correct, the point that Nim might be more useful than Python for the author sounds very sensible to me. It’s a nice spot between command line tools and more functionality-loaded languages.

The team being 'all-British' for obvious security reasons. Which I imagine might have felt like and insult to an injury to the 'little people', who, despite cracking the code, were not permitted to continue working on it. Making them, you know, 'little people'.

The wording of the abstract indicates that this article itself has been auto-generated, right? :)