ehamberg

Joined 16 years ago

Karma
1,313
Submissions
119
Member since
Sep 26
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/eh; my proof: https://keybase.io/eh/sigs/zKBsjut-lUs31yxgm8VAhck2BOTw7B3Y-nnzIihu_ww ]
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 11 years ago
Comment · 11 years ago
I simply tried (and failed, it seems) to say that they are generally considered to be equivalent, and that it's okay to use “aa” when translating a name with “å”. Reasons for this could be not knowing how to write an ‘å’ (or Ł, đ, ç, ì, etc.) or simply not wanting to distract one's readers. I do not have an authoritative source.
Comment · 11 years ago
It's acceptable (or at least “not wrong”) to use “aa” for å (and “oe” for ø/ö, “ae” for æ/ä).

While ‘å’ was made an official letter in Norwegian in 1917, it's still common to see “aa” spellings of names, and “aa” and “å” spellings are considered equivalent (fun when sorting, since ‘å’ is the last letter of the Norwegian alphabet).

Comment · 11 years ago
Comment · 11 years ago
There's a bug with the city/country detection:

People with only a country as their location, e.g. “Norway” are detected as being in “Norway, United States”. :-)

Comment · 11 years ago
… and advice/advise and prophecy/prophesy. For some reason, only the latter has kept the difference in spelling between the noun and the verb in American English.
Comment · 11 years ago
Thanks! Looks interesting. :-)
Comment · 11 years ago
Comment · 11 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago

  (S (VP avoid
         (NP (NP success)
             (PP at
                 (NP all costs)))))
vs

  (S (VP avoid
         (NP success)
         (PP at
             (NP all costs))))

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton