e3bc54b2

Current iteration of my blog is pure Elisp (org-publish). It is very simple. I like that I understand effectively whole thing bottom-up, and making any changes to machinery by advising Elisp is ridiculously easy. Being able to export the whole buffer with exact looks and feel of my Emacs theme is cherry-on-top. I like the overall feel of the thing, it has everything I need and nothing more.

My only gripe is that it is quite slow. My blog is pretty small, so having to wait on Emacs to build the whole thing is not fun. If my blog ever gets in the range of needing to compile hundred plus posts, I'll be seriously looking at alternatives. But until then, I get to enjoy just writing posts and exporting them with single keystroke.

I've been reading and reading about DeVault for more than a decade now. If I can point to one person on the internet and definitively say that their today's version is better than a decade ago, it would be him. (Yes, I can say that he appears to have improved better in this time than I myself have, which can be interpreted in a more than one way).

In fact, Andrew Kelley, whom I respect fair bit, also chose to stand behind redict, Drew's fork of redis with similar observation.

People change over time, some of them for the better, and I personally like to give them a chance. Some of Drew's opinions and expressions are still a bit much for me, but that is just us both being human.

> a better build system is sorely needed - one of the things that Go / Rust did right

Honestly there are only two reasons I wouldn't pick up Java for personal projects, difficult to build single executable (Graal is still very un-ergonomic), ridiculous build systems.

I can kind of live with former, but Gradle is so very extraordinarily terrible that I don't know where to begin. Problem is, it solves some real problems (in extremely bad way) that people keep using it.

I long of a cargo-style revolution in Java world. (No, the newly popped up alternatives haven't really cut it so far)

> It should be a distillation of the session and/or the prompts, at bare minimum.

Huh, I thought that's what commit message is for.

> How does the CCP avoid empire-building, institutional rot and general bureaucratic paralysis?

Oh they don't! In exactly the same way US didn't. Right now, a lot of factors have put enough tailwind into Chinese economy and the inertia is a bitch to retreat, as can be seen with US itself. These tailwinds are strong enough that they lift everybody up, even considering the corruption taking its share.

> all come out at “question mark in a box” (Chrome, Edge) or “codepoint hex in box” (FF) on the old Win10 box that I'm currently trying to retire. The come out find on a similarly default Win11 setup.

This is pretty funny to me, because on plain ol' Firefox on NixOS everything looks just fine!

We've come pretty far from the days when things were randomly broken on Linux..

> we remember the days where systems only had vi and not even nano was a default

What are you talking about? I'm still living those days in modern day AWS with latest EC2 machines!

> Après moi, le déluge

That phrase is chilling, and perfectly describes what I've been feeling like where the society at large is heading.

Thank you for introducing it to me.

> for me that's _peak incompetence_

Empires always fall from within. It was inconceivable for a young me to ever think of day when MS Office would be unworkable. Advance couple of decades and MS 365 Copilot is just the thing that just doesn't work. Not because somebody exploited a bug and created unviewable doc, but because MS decided to pile on bugs while leaving old ones in..

> Just don't complain when large corporations copy your work one day with no legal recourse.

To be fair, that is the schadenfreude. Large corporations have been copying works of little people for ages. They only started crying about 'IP theft' when someone bigger (China) started doing the same to them, and to make it worse, most of the corps willingly handed the IP over because they wanted cheap exploitable labor.

Hallucination is all an LLM does. That is their nature, to hallucinate.

We just happen to find some of these hallucinations useful.

Let's not pretend that hallucination is a byproduct. The usefulness is the byproduct. That is what surprised the original researchers on transformer performance, and that is why the 'attention is all you need' paper remains such a phenomenon.

The zeroeth law of Wikipedia – The problem with Wikipedia is that it only works in practice. In theory, it can never work.

As the other comment said, LLMs are not an abstraction.

An abstraction is a deterministic, pure function, than when given A always returns B. This allows the consumer to rely on the abstraction. This reliance frees up the consumer from having to implement the A->B, thus allowing it to move up the ladder.

LLMs, by their very nature are probabilistic. Probabilistic is NOT deterministic. Which means the consumer is never really sure if given A the returned value is B. Which means the consumer now has to check if the returned value is actually B, and depending on how complex A->B transformation is, the checking function is equivalent in complexity as implementing the said abstraction in the first place.