Recent submissions

Comment · 11 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago
The white paper (http://senseable.mit.edu/urbanvillages/img/manuscript.pdf) gives the assumptions to explain why call data is representative: "Mobile phone communication data are not necessarily a direct representation of the underlying social network. For instance, two individuals may maintain a strong tie through face-to-face interactions or other means of communication, without relying on regular phone calls [23]. Nevertheless, despite such a po- tential bias, a recent comparison with a questionnaire-based survey has shown that mobile phone communication data are, in general, a reliable proxy for the strength of individual- based social interactions [25]. Moreover, even if two subscribers maintain a close relationship and usually communicate via other means, it seems reasonable to assume that both individ- uals have called each other at least once during the relatively long observation period of 15 months, thus reducing the chance of missing such relationships in our network [21, 26, 27]"
Comment · 12 years ago
I'm pretty new to HN and am not sure why the post was killed. I was looking forward to an interesting debate on the value of browsers vs native apps. Can you please give advice for how to avoid being flagged while stimulating interesting debate? Thank you for the help.
Comment · 12 years ago

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton