Recent submissions

Comment · 8 years ago
No my 'of course its not' was sarcastic.
Comment · 8 years ago
EU members companies.

Come on about rules tho, man. History is messy. People are stupid and evil ( as well as good, obviously ). We live in an age where we have a great pretence of goodness, but really our nature is the same. I'm sure there a lot of double dealing happening behind the veneer of rules. And I think you're naive/uneducated in history if you think not.

Comment · 8 years ago
That is interesting. There has to be a way that IE gets a significant cut from the Apple money tho. I'd be very surprised if there wasn't. That or in future the recompensated EU members agree to invest more in IE.
Comment · 8 years ago
Yeah, sure. That was a condition by IE of the EU bringing this ruling. "You have to make us look culpable as well, it's just better for business." You really don't think that's how it works? You're too naive!
Comment · 8 years ago
Probably. What do I know. Not an expert.
Comment · 8 years ago
Of course it's not.
Comment · 8 years ago
Come on. IE is not double dealing to the EU for a bit of kick back somehow? Of course they are. That EU is "forcing" them is hilarious. IE loves to play a fake victim if they can, and in this case, all the better to be open for business. "Oh, EU, please stop getting me to get Apple to pay me taxes. Please stop making me collect revenue." Said no state ever. But believe their fake victim tale if you want. The Irish are clearly too clever for you!
Comment · 8 years ago
You have to hand it to the Irish. As a plan to collect more tax in the long term, offering (effectively) tax free status by not enforcing "Double Irish w/ Dutch Sandwich", to attract big players, letting them dig themselves into tax-debt holes for a few years while letting them feel they will get off scott-free, then enforcing it and securing a deal to get back-taxes paid, is pretty genius. Very stable genius to help rebuild their economy that was pretty crushed after 2008.
Comment · 8 years ago
But if there's no accountability, then what's the point in publishing it?

They will execute against their published (or private) policies, and there's no external oversight or way to get them to comply with anything other than what they decide are the standards.

It's not a democratic system. It's a private, totalitarian censorship enforced by a corporation with a clear liberal-politics bias ( why? because that's where they think most of their resources are tied up -- their advertisers' liberal city-dwelling customers are wealthier and thus more important than conservative, poorer country folk, and their worker drones -- mostly Cali based -- so FB staff will be predominantly liberal. )

Comment · 8 years ago
Yes! Keep going! you are approaching levels of True HN Thought that shouldn't even be possible!!
Comment · 8 years ago
I love your hustle. Your hustle is good. Also, your copy is inspiring. But sorry I got no money, heh.
Comment · 8 years ago
Ahem ....to compete with China.
Comment · 8 years ago
Ha. I'd actually laugh if it wasnt so tragic.
Comment · 8 years ago
Yes, more, more, more reeducation. I need it! Preserve the unquestionable rightness of True HN Thought!

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton