domlebo70

Devils advocate: Are they? Why? If LLM's are capable of taking absolute crap and iterating on it to achieve a purpose, then does readability really matter?

Awesome. Similar experience to me. Was selling some sim racing gear, and he mentioned he was in fabrication. Now he's my fab guy and we chat heaps.

Yeah, but at the end of the day you can't be sure right? That doubt would eat away at me

How does one even go about finding a root cause so exotic?

I love it. Easy to write and understand

Very good way to describe it. I am enjoying Opus a lot.

Maybe I'm solving different problems to you, but I don't think I've seen a single "idiot moment" from Claude Code this entire week. I've had to massage things to get them more aligned with how I want things, but I don't recall any basic syntax or logic errors.

Unclear what to do. I obviously could have invested another 30s and figured it out.

I really like the scenarios - i think there's a lot of value there. I wonder if you can double down on that somehow.

I've been on the site for 10m, and I'm loving it. I find the interface quite confusing. I'm getting value from the theory tidbits, and the scenarios. The simulation was confusing and i just noped out. I'd say the UI is a bit too overdone

I don't code in Python much. Are those type annotations really how people are using them, or is it just for the example?

    def list_files_tool(path: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:

And it returns

    {
        "path": str(full_path),
        "files": all_files
    }

Is that useful?

We do this via run in TS:

    export const run = <T>(f: () => T): T => {
      return f();
    };

Do you use plan mode? Do you link specific files as reference using @? Those two alone make a big difference for me.

I've never used it, but watched from afar. So many interesting ideas. The website is also really good. Congrats Paul and team

You need to do more drugs then.