dirkk0

Awesome! Thanks for opening this and bringing GeaStack to my attention!

Got it, great to hear that! On your Patreon now, and I sponsored via GitHub.

Understood. While I have your attention: it would be great if the official version would have a web version, too.

And thanks for your work!!

Thanks. The CRA's own version of what you are describing is harmonised standards: Art. 27 gives you a presumption of conformity with the Annex I requirements if you follow one whose reference has been published in the Official Journal.

The catch is that they do not exist yet. M/606 covers around 41 standards and was accepted by CEN, CENELEC and ETSI in 2025, but the Commission's July 2026 draft amendment pushed the deadlines back two months: the two core horizontal standards (secure development, vulnerability handling) are now due 31 October 2026, the verticals 31 December 2026, and the remaining horizontal ones October 2027, about a year before full application.

And delivery is not the same as availability - a standard only gives you the Art. 27 presumption once its reference is cited in the Official Journal. Nothing has been cited for the CRA yet: the Commission's harmonised standards site lists 40 pieces of legislation and the CRA is not among them.

On tooling specifically: the Open Regulatory Compliance Working Group (orcwg.org) runs a CRA hub on GitHub, closest thing I have found to what you describe.

I wish it were less complicated. :)

For me, it works better than ever. When I once saw a quality decline, it was conflicting CLAUDE.md files for me (local vs. global) so basically my fault.

same here, I am still in shock. took me 10 minutes to find the 'operational issue' message in the dashboard. longest 10 minutes of my life.

very cool! Did the LLM just help you with the software, or also with the 3D print?

thanks for pointing this out, exactly what I was looking for.